I am getting ex-cited. The heart of any well-crafted opinion is its citations—whether it’s Black’s or Blackstone, Corbin on Contracts or Hazard on Ethics, proper authority is the lifeblood of stare decisis. To resolve certain issues, however, a typical cite just won’t do, so judges put down the United States Reports in favor of other, less-august sources:
“Alice in Wonderland”: Rare is the judge with a literary bent (in this instance, former Chief Justice Warren Burger) who can resist citing Humpty Dumpty’s take on statutory construction: “‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.’” Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 173 n. 18 (1978). Mind you, Lewis Carroll is no one-cite pony. See Parhat v. Gates, 532 F.3d 834, 848-49 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (“the fact that the government has ‘said it thrice’ does not make an allegation true. See Lewis Carroll, “The Hunting of the Snark 3″ (1876) (“I have said it thrice: What I tell you three times is true.”).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]