John Rowland’s back on center stage, and, once again, jurors will be told half the truth, and anything but the entire truth. Why? Why does the government get to ask for accountability while playing hide the ball with jurors?
I am not talking about the startling revelation that prosecutors erred and forwarded to the defense team material the government should never have had at all. I am referring, of course, to the government’s giving to the Rowland defense team privileged communications between a cooperating witness and the witness’s lawyers, Hubert Santos and his daughter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
