On March 31, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, holding that providers cannot sue under the Supremacy Clause to invalidate Medicaid rates that conflict with the Medicaid Act’s requirements that rates be sufficient to support quality care and enlist enough providers to ensure equal service access to Medicaid recipients. Armstrong thus removed one major avenue for providers to challenge the reasonableness of Medicaid rates. At a time when state budgetary concerns are driving the reimbursement rates for medical services provided to the neediest Americans, Armstrong is a blow to both Medicaid providers and patients. Despite the ruling, however, some avenues remain for challenging inadequate reimbursement rates.
Medicaid is a federal-state partnership. State participation is voluntary. But if a state chooses to participate and receive federal funds, it must follow federal Medicaid rules. Each state develops and administers its own state plan under the oversight of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In Connecticut, the Department of Social Services (DSS) administers the Medicaid program and sets the reimbursement rates paid to providers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
