An eight-year legal battle over a used-car dealership has resulted in a state Supreme Court ruling that could affect future cases where a landowner argues that zoning rules have resulted in property being “practically confiscated.”
The unusual case pitted various Meriden city officials against each other and, attorneys say, illustrated that the courts are becoming less deferential to decisions made by local zoning officials.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
