Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death has renewed speculation about how the Supreme Court may decide the fate of university affirmative action in Fisher v. University of Texas. It’s worth taking another look at the multitude of amicus briefs in that case, one of which sparked Scalia’s controversial comments during oral argument that minority students might be better off at less academically rigorous institutions. His comments serve as a reminder that, at least occasionally, amicus briefs catch the attention of the justices and influence their thinking.
The Fisher case, before the court for the second time in three years, involves a challenge to the university’s consideration of race in its admissions process. Relying on an amicus brief filed by UCLA economist and law professor Richard Sander, Scalia questioned whether African-American students might be better off at a “slower-track school where they do well,” rather than at the University of Texas.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
