One of the possible unintended consequences of the new mandatory CLE rule is a loss of one of the most-used diversionary programs for first-time offenders with less than “reprimand-worthy” conduct. This may result in a ratcheting-up of the potential consequences of being the subject of a grievance. More work for me and my colleagues, but probably not the best thing for the bar or the lawyer discipline system.
The way our lawyer discipline system works is that the filing of a grievance is a “non-public event.” That means records of the case are available to judges and disciplinary lawyers in the system, but not the public. Only when probable cause is found does the matter become public. That change was made several decades ago in reaction to lawyers’ complaints that unhappy clients could sully their reputations with unfounded complaints that would appear on their public records regardless of their frivolous nature.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
