Whether they hide under the names of John Doe or Richard Roe, members of the legal community who have judicial discretion to thank for keeping their private scandals from going public are raising some high-placed eyebrows.
Not the least of which are those of Chief Justice William J. Sullivan and Justice David M. Borden. On the panel hearing the appeal of a rejected bar applicant March 12, both state Supreme Court jurists remarked about the seemingly better treatment lawyers are afforded than non-lawyer professionals in keeping their dirty laundry under wraps in court proceedings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
