Initiation of foreclosure proceedings does not rise to the level of “irreparable harm” sufficient to justify a temporary injunction, the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled.
The ruling came in a case involving a dispute over a $250,000 collateral mortgage, which the borrower claimed its original lender incorrectly assigned to a successor. Plus, the borrower argued, that successor nearly doubled the payoff amount to about $478,500—putting a kink in plans to sell the property to avoid foreclosure. In seeking the injunction, the plaintiff alleged usury and tortious interference in a real estate sale, but the Fourth DCA found otherwise.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
