How to Navigate the Uncertainty of Doing Business in Cuba
Nothing impedes business like uncertainty; therefore it's not surprising that many U.S. business owners still have more questions than answers about how they can do business in Cuba. The questions first arose in a substantive way on Dec. 17, 2014, when the Obama administration and the Cuban government announced they were taking steps to reestablish diplomatic and greater commercial relations between the two countries, write Yosbel A. Ibarra and Osvaldo Miranda.
July 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
Nothing impedes business like uncertainty; therefore it's not surprising that many U.S. business owners still have more questions than answers about how they can do business in Cuba. The questions first arose in a substantive way on Dec. 17, 2014, when the Obama administration and the Cuban government announced they were taking steps to reestablish diplomatic and greater commercial relations between the two countries.
The news was a radical change to the more than half a century policy of isolation pursued by the U.S. government. While Cuba is just 11 million people with a state-run economy of about $80 billion, many U.S. business leaders wanted to leverage what they perceived as a great opportunity to enter a new market. Now, after more than two-and-a-half years and the election of President Donald J. Trump, we see how complicated the answer to the question of how to do business in Cuba can be for U.S. companies.
The initial steps to take
So far, the reality of doing business with Cuba has been an exercise in patience, frustration and hope for American companies. As a first step, most American ventures in Cuba will require approval from the U.S. government. The process can be lengthy, often taking months—if not years, due to a range of factors, including an intensive inter-agency review process and the high number of requests being reviewed by the main regulatory agency, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which also oversees U.S. sanctions programs against a number of other countries, entities and individuals. The licensing process is lengthy, as OFAC and the other U.S. agencies overseeing the Cuban embargo are staffed by professionals who must operate pursuant to established regulations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readGraffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250