Hurricane Irma Forces Employers to Consider Effects on Employee Pay
Florida officials' early estimates forecast that Florida businesses stand to lose over $50 billion in lost economic output, lost revenue, and property and crop damage from Hurricane Irma.
October 03, 2017 at 12:05 PM
5 minute read
Florida officials' early estimates forecast that Florida businesses stand to lose over $50 billion in lost economic output, lost revenue, and property and crop damage from Hurricane Irma. They privately admit the figure will likely be higher. In addition, hourly workers and sometimes salaried workers may also lose income, sometimes much needed pay, because Irma forced businesses to close early and remain closed for days.
Unlike some states that have rules regarding pay for inclement weather closure, or require or encourage inclement weather days be paid time off, Florida provides little or no guidance to employers regarding compensating employees for lost time because of Irma. Instead, employers must look to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Department of Labor regulations, which provide for different treatment of hourly, nonexempt employees and salaried employees. Further, an employer's own policy manual or a collective bargaining agreement may need to be consulted to arrive at an answer.
FLSA Mandates Treatment of Employee Pay
As a general rule, the FLSA obligates employers to pay hourly, nonexempt employees only for those hours that are actually worked. Therefore, if an employer closes a business early in anticipation of a hurricane, the employer is not required to pay nonexempt employees who are sent home due to the approaching storm. Nor is there a legal requirement to pay such workers if the business remains closed during and after the storm. Such missed time is not considered to be “hours worked” for determining pay for hourly, non-exempt employees. However, time spent at work helping the business close or prepare for Irma would be compensable.
Businesses may allow these employees to use vacation time, paid time off (PTO) or sick leave (as long as it is in compliance with company policy) to cover the time lost; however, if employees have already used up such time, an employer is not required to provide more PTO days simply because the business did not operate due to a hurricane. Businesses are free to provide compensation to nonexempt employees for time missed as a “bonus” or to boost employee morale, but are not required to do so. However, any voluntary payments made would not be considered “hours worked” so it would not be counted towards a calculation of overtime. In addition, if hourly, nonexempt employees didn't come to work after the business re-opened, businesses are not required to allow workers to make up missed time even if they are unable to report to work because of impacts Irma made on infrastructure or transportation.
One wrinkle is that if an employer has previously allowed hourly, nonexempt employees to telecommute (i.e., work from home or another location), employers will be responsible for compensating employees for hours worked and arranging to properly record and document this time while the normal business location is closed. And employers may be required to offer temporary telecommuting to disabled employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and pay these employees for hours worked outside the office. Yet another wrinkle are employees employed under a flex time or fluctuating schedule who are guaranteed payments regardless of the number of hours worked in a week. As long as the business is not closed for a full workweek, these employees must be paid.
A different set of rules applies to exempt employees. The FLSA requires employers to pay exempt employees their full salary if the business was closed for less than a week regardless of how many hours the exempt employee actually worked. Conversely, if the business is closed for an entire workweek then employers are not required to pay exempt employees for that week, unless these employees are permitted to telecommute and record any amount of working hours because then they must receive their full salary for that week. Once the business reopens, employees who choose not to come to work, or not to work from home if it is permitted, would be required to take a PTO day for the missed work or have deductions made from their salary for missing the full day of work as long as the absence is not for illness or disability.
Businesses May Not Be Creative in Attempting to Recover Lost Time
Any efforts by businesses to recover some of that lost time following Irma must comply with the FLSA regulations, such as overtime rules. Businesses may not circumvent the FLSA simply because they lost productive time. It is possible that business interruption insurance might cover payments made to employees during the time the business was closed. Or, given that Gov. Rick Scott declared a state of emergency for all Florida counties, assistance may be available from programs such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's unemployment assistance program.
Understanding the law is important to avoid, even inadvertently, FLSA violations or unexpected pay obligations, including overtime, that may further impact businesses already dealing with the economic effects of Irma's visit.
Aaron Tandy heads the Pathman Lewis employment law practice, helping employers and employees navigate complex employment issues. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Employee's Alleged Action Lands Marriott in Court for Defamation, Negligence
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250