Employee Compensation During Emergency Shutdowns: Pay or Not Pay?
n the middle of one of the worst hurricane seasons in recorded history, we have been receiving questions across our offices about how to handle pay for emergency shutdowns in the middle of a day, extended company closings, and planned or unplanned late openings.
October 04, 2017 at 12:48 PM
4 minute read
In the middle of one of the worst hurricane seasons in recorded history, we have been receiving questions across our offices about how to handle pay for emergency shutdowns in the middle of a day, extended company closings, and planned or unplanned late openings. With ice storm and blizzard season around the corner, I will try to summarize some of these pay considerations. Always keep in mind the basic principle that employees always must be paid for all time actually worked.
Salaried Employees
Salaried employees, to retain their overtime exemption, must be paid their full salary in any week in which they perform any work. Thus, a closure for an approaching storm front or unusable work location will not allow an employer to deduct any percentage of a salaried employee's pay for the hours not worked.
There basically are three exceptions for inclement weather to this rule for salaried employees. First, if the employee has a paid-time-off (PTO) plan, the employer may require the employee to use some of his PTO time for a weather-related closure. In this instance, the salaried employee obviously continues to receive full pay (but some of it comes from the PTO bank). The second exception is that an employee need not be paid his salary in any work week in which no work is performed. This exception would apply to the more severe Harvey-like disasters. So, if the office is closed the entire week, an employer does not have to pay even exempt employees who performed no work. Finally, employers may deduct for full-day absences, but only full-day absences, if the business is open and the employee is unable to get to work due to the weather (this would be categorized as an unpaid personal day for something other than sickness or disability).
Hourly Employees
Pay for hourly employees during weather disasters is fairly simple. Hourly employees must be paid for all hours actually worked. If employees do not come in, are turned away at the door, or are sent home early, the rule is the same–pay hourly employees for hours actually worked.
Employers are not required to pay “show-up” pay under most state laws. These include the southern states. Some northeastern and western states do have show-up pay requirements contained in their state laws. Those laws should be checked if necessary for those requirements and any exceptions to them, such as exceptions that result from timely and effective notice of a closing by the company.
Working Remotely
As mentioned above, all employees, hourly and salaried, must be paid for all time worked. This includes time worked from home or any other offsite location. Employees with remotely logged-in computers, cellphones, and old-fashioned toolboxes must be monitored for actual work performed when the employer's business otherwise is closed.
In this age of working remotely, whether using new technology or just running old fashioned errands while the office is closed, employers must be careful with hourly employees. Hourly employees must be paid for all time actually worked, even when working away from the company's normally required time clock or log-in procedure.
Contractual Pay
In addition to considering federal and state wage-and-hour laws, contractual requirements could impose greater obligations on an employer. Individual employment contracts could contain such provisions, as could collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) in union settings. CBAs, for example, often contain show-up pay provisions and have restrictions on mandatory use of PTO.
Employees Who Work Even Though It's Not Required
Employees must be paid for all time worked. That is the rule no matter whether the employee was required to work or did so voluntarily. Additional payments or bonuses are allowed but not required. Of course, gifts and other forms of recognition also are allowed. Unfortunately, however, for the purpose of calculating overtime pay for hourly employees in a given work week, all remuneration must be included in the base rate before multiplying that rate by time and a half for hours worked over 40.
When in doubt, always start with the basic principles that hourly employees should be paid for all of their time worked and that salaried employees should be paid all of their full salaries unless a very narrow exception applies.
John W. Hargrove is a partner and chair of the labor and employment practice group at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings in Birmingham, Alabama. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You're in Trial. You're Sick Again': Addressing Attorney Stress
Trending Stories
- 1Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 2Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 3Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 4Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 5Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250