Florida Bar Should Pay $143K To Alters After 'Imbalanced' Investigation, Referee Finds
The bar's case against Dania Beach attorney Jeremy Alters was doomed from the start, the court-appointed referee wrote.
October 05, 2017 at 03:39 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Bar should pay about $143,000 to attorney Jeremy Alters after it ”stridently pursued the wrong lawyer” for five years in a discipline case, a court-appointed referee wrote in scathing a report filed Thursday.
The referee, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Marcia Caballero, found Alters not guilty on four of the most serious misconduct and fraud charges last November after a trial on the bar's claims that Alters misappropriated trust account funds. She recommended no sanctions.
The Florida Bar then sought more than $305,000 in prosecution costs from Alters, who was found guilty of two charges for failure to prevent the recurrence of problems created by others.
Caballero found the bar's requested costs were unnecessary and excessive given Alters prevailed on the important points of the case. The Dania Beach lawyer never disputed that $1 million was missing from his former firm's trust accounts in 2009 and 2010.
“The essence of this case was never a dispute over how much was improperly transferred from trust to operating, but over who was responsible,” Caballero wrote. “The bar ignored evidence that was front and center and refused to believe or even interview credible witnesses.”
The Florida Bar showed “a remarkable and disturbing imbalance in its investigation” between Alters and Kimberly Boldt, who was managing partner of Alters Boldt Brown Rash & Culmo at the time, the referee wrote.
According to Alters, in 2010 Boldt told him and the firm's lawyer, Bruce Rogow, that she made a mistake. A former partner at the firm told Boldt he was wiring the firm $1 million attained from a settlement, and she instructed the firm's then-comptroller to pay the bills without realizing the funds hadn't come in, according to Alters' and Rogow's recollection of the conversation.
Boldt testified she had no role in the firm's financial decisions. She was cleared of wrongdoing in a consent judgment with the bar. The bar met with her six times while refusing to meet with Alters, Caballero wrote.
“It was clear to this referee that the bar stridently pursued the wrong lawyer,” Caballero wrote. “It was Ms. Boldt who, despite her denials, authorized over $1 million of improper trust account transfers. Based upon her several days on the witness stand, this referee found her not to be a credible witness. Yet, inexplicably, the charges against her were dropped and she was given diversion, which is not even considered discipline.”
Boldt's attorney, Hank Coxe of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Coxe, declined to comment, citing Alters' disciplinary matter pending before the Florida Supreme Court.
Caballero found the bar should be granted $1,250 in costs, but recommended Alters be awarded nearly $144,000 for his costs, including paying his attorney and a polygraph expert.
“Why the bar chose to side with [Boldt] and ignore the evidence remains a mystery, but it must pay the cost of that bad choice because there were no justiciable issues of law or fact; simply, there was no evidence that [Alters] authorized or that he knew about the improper trust account transfers when they occurred,” Caballero wrote.
The Florida Supreme Court will make the final decision. The court has not yet ruled on whether Alters should face discipline, and bar prosecutors are still seeking his disbarment.
Alters' attorney, Andrew Berman of Young Berman Karpf & Gonzalez in Miami, welcomed the findings.
“We are grateful to Judge Caballero for the over five years of effort and time she put into the case and for the well reasoned recommendations,” he said in an email.
Alters, a personal injury lawyer now with Morelli Alters, said last year that the bar's prosecution cost his firm tens of millions of dollars in legal fees. He was removed from successful class action cases he started, including Chinese drywall and bank overdraft fee litigation, and lost dozens of friends and employees.
A Florida Bar spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250