$37M Hit-and-Run Verdict Results From Novel Punitive Damages Argument
A Miami attorney hopes an order he obtained will help the plaintiffs bar win higher damages in personal injury cases.
October 12, 2017 at 04:09 PM
7 minute read
A Miami attorney who won a $37 million jury verdict hopes an argument he made will help the plaintiffs bar fight for higher damages in injury cases.
Leesfield Scolaro partner Justin Shapiro knew he wanted to seek punitive damages against a driver who hit a teenage skateboarder and fled. The lawsuit was undefended and the driver was uninsured, so the boy's family won't receive the money a Miami-Dade jury awarded them Tuesday. But punitive damages are meant to prevent other drivers from causing similar tragedies.
Shapiro faced a challenge, though: He didn't have case law to support his motion.
Punitive damages are reserved for cases involving intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which Shapiro believed were evident in the driver's decision to leave the scene where the teen died. But typically, reckless behavior warranting punitive damages happen before an injury.
“The two that you see all the time are drunk driving and intentional battery — if you slug someone in the jaw and break their jaw, of course punitive damages are warranted,” Shapiro said. “But aside from those two instances in personal injury law, there are not many clear-cut examples.”
In this case, defendant Gabriel Fleuricourt's decision to flee happened after he hit 16-year-old Cash Pereira on the one-lane 12th Avenue near Northwest 108th Terrace in Miami. Fleuricourt confessed the 2015 hit-and-run to police, according to NBC 6 Miami. A criminal court judge found him incompetent to stand trial.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jacqueline Hogan Scola initially denied Shapiro's motion for punitive damages as premature. The attorney needed to link Cash's death to Fleuricourt's failure to stop and help.
The judge wanted more support for the proposition that leaving the scene caused or contributed to the death, because there was no case law saying that leaving the scene in fact warrants punitive damages as a matter of law, Shapiro said.
Shapiro's new motion argued a lack of timely medical treatment was the link between Fleuricourt fleeing and the teen's death.
According to testimony from a police detective, at least 10 minutes elapsed between the nighttime crash and the arrival of first responders. The detective told the court that in his experience, those minutes were crucial and might have saved Cash's life. Instead, he was pronounced dead at the scene.
Scola was subbing for Judge John Schlesinger, who granted the new motion and sent the question of punitive damages to the jury. With a default liability judgment against Fleuricourt in hand, jurors awarded $37 million to the Pereira family, including $27.7 million in punitive damages.
“The idea here is that lawyers can use this order that I obtained from Schlesinger as persuasive with other judges that this is something that should be allowed,” Shapiro said.
He said he was proud to help the Pereira family, who pursued the civil case to obtain some measure of justice and closure after the death of their youngest child.
“This has just destroyed them,” he said. “They pray for him every night. They light candles and cut cakes and have pictures around their table during his birthday. They visit his gravesite regularly. It's just as awful as anyone could possibly try to imagine, a 16-year-old boy with excellent high school grades headed for college.”
A request for comment made through Fleuricourt's criminal defense attorney was not returned.
A Miami attorney who won a $37 million jury verdict hopes an argument he made will help the plaintiffs bar fight for higher damages in injury cases.
Leesfield Scolaro partner Justin Shapiro knew he wanted to seek punitive damages against a driver who hit a teenage skateboarder and fled. The lawsuit was undefended and the driver was uninsured, so the boy's family won't receive the money a Miami-Dade jury awarded them Tuesday. But punitive damages are meant to prevent other drivers from causing similar tragedies.
Shapiro faced a challenge, though: He didn't have case law to support his motion.
Punitive damages are reserved for cases involving intentional misconduct or gross negligence, which Shapiro believed were evident in the driver's decision to leave the scene where the teen died. But typically, reckless behavior warranting punitive damages happen before an injury.
“The two that you see all the time are drunk driving and intentional battery — if you slug someone in the jaw and break their jaw, of course punitive damages are warranted,” Shapiro said. “But aside from those two instances in personal injury law, there are not many clear-cut examples.”
In this case, defendant Gabriel Fleuricourt's decision to flee happened after he hit 16-year-old Cash Pereira on the one-lane 12th Avenue near Northwest 108th Terrace in Miami. Fleuricourt confessed the 2015 hit-and-run to police, according to NBC 6 Miami. A criminal court judge found him incompetent to stand trial.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge
The judge wanted more support for the proposition that leaving the scene caused or contributed to the death, because there was no case law saying that leaving the scene in fact warrants punitive damages as a matter of law, Shapiro said.
Shapiro's new motion argued a lack of timely medical treatment was the link between Fleuricourt fleeing and the teen's death.
According to testimony from a police detective, at least 10 minutes elapsed between the nighttime crash and the arrival of first responders. The detective told the court that in his experience, those minutes were crucial and might have saved Cash's life. Instead, he was pronounced dead at the scene.
Scola was subbing for Judge
“The idea here is that lawyers can use this order that I obtained from Schlesinger as persuasive with other judges that this is something that should be allowed,” Shapiro said.
He said he was proud to help the Pereira family, who pursued the civil case to obtain some measure of justice and closure after the death of their youngest child.
“This has just destroyed them,” he said. “They pray for him every night. They light candles and cut cakes and have pictures around their table during his birthday. They visit his gravesite regularly. It's just as awful as anyone could possibly try to imagine, a 16-year-old boy with excellent high school grades headed for college.”
A request for comment made through Fleuricourt's criminal defense attorney was not returned.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250