Nursing Homes Seek Variances From Generator Requirement
As industry attorneys wage a legal battle over new rules requiring nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have generators that can…
October 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM
3 minute read
As industry attorneys wage a legal battle over new rules requiring nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have generators that can power air-conditioning systems, providers are asking for variances from the rule carrying a Nov. 15 deadline.
Thirty-three providers requested variances in two days last week, a review of state documents shows.
And that's just beginning, said Florida Health Care Association spokeswoman Kristen Knapp. She predicted “you are going to see a lot more” this week from members of the association representing hundreds of nursing homes.
Gov. Rick Scott's administration last month issued the emergency generator rule after eight residents of a sweltering Broward County nursing home died following Hurricane Irma. Six more residents died later after being evacuated.
Hurricane Irma knocked out the air conditioning at the two-story nursing home, The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, which did not have a backup generator for cooling.
But nursing homes and assisted living facilities have objected to the emergency rule because they were only given 60 days to comply.
Florida law states the “strict application of uniformly applicable rule requirements can lead to unreasonable, unfair, and unintended results” and agencies are authorized to grant variances and waivers to rules that cause a substantial hardship.
To clarify the existing variance process, the Scott administration issued another emergency rule Thursday that in part laid out information the Agency for Health Care Administration wants providers to include in the requests for variances.
The changes, however, do not mean the governor is backing off his power policy, the administration says.
“It has no effect on the emergency generator rule and its enforcement. AHCA has made it clear that they will enforce this rule aggressively, and they will continue to do just that.” Scott spokesman McKinley Lewis said.
Long-term care facilities are seeking the variances because the Nov. 15 compliance deadline is nearing, and facilities that aren't in compliance face steep penalties, including possible license revocation.
“They are working to comply,” Knapp said. “There's just a lot of issues involved in installing generators.”
Industry groups LeadingAge Florida, the Florida Assisted Living Association and Florida Argentum also filed legal challenges to the validity of the emergency rules.
Attorneys spent a second day Friday in a hearing before Administrative Law Judge Garnett Chisenhall. The emergency rules require nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have enough power to keep ambient temperatures at a maximum of 80 degrees for 96 hours.
Chisenhall has two weeks to issue an order.
Though the state Agency for Health Care Administration has regulatory oversight of assisted living facilities, the state Department of Elder Affairs is required to work with AHCA in drafting rules.
Catherine Ann Avery, bureau chief of elder rights for the Department of Elder Affairs, testified she worked with the department's general counsel on the emergency regulations.
But during cross-examination, Baker Donelson of counsel Amy W. Schrader in Tallahassee, who represents Florida Argentum, referenced an email between AHCA and the department and noted the majority of the rule language was proposed by the agency.
Christine Sexton reports for the New Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShifting Battlegrounds in Administrative Law, From Biden to Trump II
How Florida Supreme Court Changes Affect Firms: AI Concerns at Forefront
Trending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250