Nursing Homes Seek Variances From Generator Requirement
As industry attorneys wage a legal battle over new rules requiring nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have generators that can…
October 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM
3 minute read
Amy Schrader of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz |
As industry attorneys wage a legal battle over new rules requiring nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have generators that can power air-conditioning systems, providers are asking for variances from the rule carrying a Nov. 15 deadline.
Thirty-three providers requested variances in two days last week, a review of state documents shows.
And that's just beginning, said Florida Health Care Association spokeswoman Kristen Knapp. She predicted “you are going to see a lot more” this week from members of the association representing hundreds of nursing homes.
Gov. Rick Scott's administration last month issued the emergency generator rule after eight residents of a sweltering Broward County nursing home died following Hurricane Irma. Six more residents died later after being evacuated.
Hurricane Irma knocked out the air conditioning at the two-story nursing home, The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, which did not have a backup generator for cooling.
But nursing homes and assisted living facilities have objected to the emergency rule because they were only given 60 days to comply.
Florida law states the “strict application of uniformly applicable rule requirements can lead to unreasonable, unfair, and unintended results” and agencies are authorized to grant variances and waivers to rules that cause a substantial hardship.
To clarify the existing variance process, the Scott administration issued another emergency rule Thursday that in part laid out information the Agency for Health Care Administration wants providers to include in the requests for variances.
The changes, however, do not mean the governor is backing off his power policy, the administration says.
“It has no effect on the emergency generator rule and its enforcement. AHCA has made it clear that they will enforce this rule aggressively, and they will continue to do just that.” Scott spokesman McKinley Lewis said.
Long-term care facilities are seeking the variances because the Nov. 15 compliance deadline is nearing, and facilities that aren't in compliance face steep penalties, including possible license revocation.
“They are working to comply,” Knapp said. “There's just a lot of issues involved in installing generators.”
Industry groups LeadingAge Florida, the Florida Assisted Living Association and Florida Argentum also filed legal challenges to the validity of the emergency rules.
Attorneys spent a second day Friday in a hearing before Administrative Law Judge Garnett Chisenhall. The emergency rules require nursing homes and assisted living facilities to have enough power to keep ambient temperatures at a maximum of 80 degrees for 96 hours.
Chisenhall has two weeks to issue an order.
Though the state Agency for Health Care Administration has regulatory oversight of assisted living facilities, the state Department of Elder Affairs is required to work with AHCA in drafting rules.
Catherine Ann Avery, bureau chief of elder rights for the Department of Elder Affairs, testified she worked with the department's general counsel on the emergency regulations.
But during cross-examination, Baker Donelson of counsel Amy W. Schrader in Tallahassee, who represents Florida Argentum, referenced an email between AHCA and the department and noted the majority of the rule language was proposed by the agency.
Christine Sexton reports for the New Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Florida Supreme Court Changes Affect Firms: AI Concerns at Forefront
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250