State Trying to Scuttle University Matching Gift Lawsuits
The state is asking a Leon circuit judge to dismiss a case alleging the state has failed to match $460 million in private donations to…
October 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM
5 minute read
Century Tower and University Auditorium at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. |
The state is asking a Leon circuit judge to dismiss a case alleging the state has failed to match $460 million in private donations to universities and state colleges that were made under Florida's matching-gift laws.
University of Florida graduates and Florida State University donors filed separate class action lawsuits, which were consolidated, seeking to force the state to come up with $600 million in matching funds in exchange for the gifts.
In a motion, lawyers for the state said the matching-gift laws are subject to annual budget decisions by the Legislature, and it would violate the constitutional separation of powers if the judiciary ordered lawmakers to appropriate the money.
“As with all other funding programs the Legislature has created, the statutes create programs but they do not appropriate any state funds for those programs; the programs are subject to future appropriations,” the motion said.
Noting the “firm separation” of constitutional authority among the legislative, executive and judicial branches, the motion added: “Because plaintiffs' requested relief would violate the separation of powers, it cannot be granted.”
The state's motion also attacked an alternate request for relief that asks the court to issue an order requiring the executive branch, including the governor, to make a request to the Legislature for the matching funds.
“They lack standing to pursue this alternate relief as it cannot remedy any harm they allegedly have suffered; a budget request, after all, is only a request,” the motion said.
University of Florida alumni Ryan and Alexis Geffin filed a lawsuit in July, alleging their undergraduate education was harmed because matching funds weren't provided for construction projects at the school.
The programs cited by the lawsuit included two construction-related funds, the Alec P. Courtelis University Facility Enhancement Challenge Grant Program and the Florida College System Institution Capital Facilities Matching Program, as well as the Dr. Philip Benjamin Matching Grant Program and the University Major Gifts Program.
A second lawsuit was filed by two Florida State University law school graduates, Tommy Warren, a former FSU football player, and his wife, Kathleen Villacorta. The suit cited their $100,000 donation to the FSU law school to a scholarship fund that was never matched by the state and their $100,000 donation to a scholarship program for students studying marine conservation that was also never matched by the state.
Under a 2011 law, the programs cannot be restarted until a backlog of $200 million in donations for the Courtelis program as well as the other three matching-grant programs have been matched.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
Century Tower and University Auditorium at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. |
The state is asking a Leon circuit judge to dismiss a case alleging the state has failed to match $460 million in private donations to universities and state colleges that were made under Florida's matching-gift laws.
University of Florida graduates and Florida State University donors filed separate class action lawsuits, which were consolidated, seeking to force the state to come up with $600 million in matching funds in exchange for the gifts.
In a motion, lawyers for the state said the matching-gift laws are subject to annual budget decisions by the Legislature, and it would violate the constitutional separation of powers if the judiciary ordered lawmakers to appropriate the money.
“As with all other funding programs the Legislature has created, the statutes create programs but they do not appropriate any state funds for those programs; the programs are subject to future appropriations,” the motion said.
Noting the “firm separation” of constitutional authority among the legislative, executive and judicial branches, the motion added: “Because plaintiffs' requested relief would violate the separation of powers, it cannot be granted.”
The state's motion also attacked an alternate request for relief that asks the court to issue an order requiring the executive branch, including the governor, to make a request to the Legislature for the matching funds.
“They lack standing to pursue this alternate relief as it cannot remedy any harm they allegedly have suffered; a budget request, after all, is only a request,” the motion said.
University of Florida alumni Ryan and Alexis Geffin filed a lawsuit in July, alleging their undergraduate education was harmed because matching funds weren't provided for construction projects at the school.
The programs cited by the lawsuit included two construction-related funds, the Alec P. Courtelis University Facility Enhancement Challenge Grant Program and the Florida College System Institution Capital Facilities Matching Program, as well as the Dr. Philip Benjamin Matching Grant Program and the University Major Gifts Program.
A second lawsuit was filed by two Florida State University law school graduates, Tommy Warren, a former FSU football player, and his wife, Kathleen Villacorta. The suit cited their $100,000 donation to the FSU law school to a scholarship fund that was never matched by the state and their $100,000 donation to a scholarship program for students studying marine conservation that was also never matched by the state.
Under a 2011 law, the programs cannot be restarted until a backlog of $200 million in donations for the Courtelis program as well as the other three matching-grant programs have been matched.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readMiami Law's Class Action Forum to Feature Judges, New Rules, and Insights on MDL Practice
3 minute readArguing Class Actions: Meet and Confer Abuses as Defendants' Litigation Strategy
7 minute readLawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250