General Motors Agrees to $120M Ignition Switch Settlement With States
The settlement benefits the attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia.
October 19, 2017 at 02:12 PM
3 minute read
General Motors Co. will pay $120 million to state attorneys general to settle allegations the automaker concealed an ignition-switch defect.
The settlement, announced Thursday, comes three years after GM issued recalls for more than 9 million vehicles in the U.S. for a defect that could cause cars to suddenly lose electrical systems, including power steering and power brakes. In some situations, air bags failed to deploy in a collision.
The settlement benefits the attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia. Arizona did not participate.
“The resolution includes a financial component and assures GM will continue ongoing improvements made to ensure the safety of its vehicles,” GM said in a statement. “These improvements include continuation of a new organizational structure devoted to global vehicle safety and the company's Speak Up for Safety program.”
GM previously paid about $2 billion to the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, consumers and shareholders. That amount includes nearly $600 million placed in a victims' compensation fund overseen by Ken Feinberg. The Detroit company filed for bankruptcy in 2009.
The states claimed GM employees knew as early as 2004 that the ignition switch could be a safety risk. But recalls were delayed for years.
GM agreed as part of the settlement not to tell consumers a vehicle is safe unless it meets federal motor vehicle safety standards. Used vehicles may not be called “safe” or “subject to rigorous inspection” unless there are no open recalls affecting them, the agreement continues.
The settlement also requires GM to instruct dealers to complete recall repairs before making a car eligible for certification or delivering it to a customer.
The GM investigation and negotiation was led by the attorneys general of Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Texas.
“Like any other business — large or small — automakers have an obligation to represent the products they sell honestly, to ensure those products are safe, and to alert consumers when they discover a product defect that threatens consumer safety,” New Jersey Attorney General Christopher Porrino said in a statement. “When they fail to do so, as was the case with GM, we are committed to holding them accountable.”
The $120 million settlement includes $6 million for Florida, $4.3 million for New York, $4.1 million for New Jersey, $7.3 million for Texas and $3.2 million for Connecticut.
“Instead of prioritizing customers, General Motors turned a blind eye for years and chose to conceal the safety defects associated with several models of their vehicles,” New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a statement. “New Yorkers should not have to worry about their steering or brakes failing or their air bags not deploying when they get behind the wheel. Today's settlement ensures that drivers receive the transparency they deserve when they purchase a car.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLyft Seeks to Compel Arbitration in Lawsuit, but Plaintiff Claims Terms Do Not Match What Happened
4 minute readInternational Crypto Bank Faces New York Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit
3 minute readJudge Slaps $16 Million Penalty on Defendants in Wyndham Timeshare Advertising Fraud Case
4 minute read'A Wake-Up Call': Experts Assess Impact of SSN Data Breach Case
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250