One Easy, One Hard: Ga. Judge Nominees Get to Full Senate in Different Ways
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee approves two nominees to Georgia federal courts.
October 20, 2017 at 02:33 PM
11 minute read
U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday cleared the way for two nominees for the federal court in Atlanta to receive confirmation votes by the full Senate.
The panel voted 11-9 along party lines for Judge William Ray of the Georgia Court of Appeals. Michael Brown, an Alston & Bird partner, was approved on a voice vote.
The committee delayed a vote on Judge Tripp Self of the state Court of Appeals, who has been nominated to the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia.
Despite the split vote, the senators engaged in no debate over Ray. Democrats on the panel had quizzed Ray last month at a hearing over his opposition to a hate crime law when he was a Republican state senator.
Ray had explained that he opposed that bill because “it required that a judge was the one who was going to make the decision as to whether or not the defendant acted with some hate toward some particular identifiable group. And that was in direct contradiction to a United States Supreme Court decision … which said it had to be a jury decision.”
Ray also said the bill in question provided for no additional penalties. “I thought … it was simply a political statement,” he said, adding the bill had another problem. “It didn't really identify the groups … that were targeted. It could have been anyone.”
The liberal Alliance for Justice group had urged tough scrutiny of Ray, who was warmly supported by Georgia's Sens. Johnny Isakson and David Perdue, both Republicans.
Ray declined to comment on Friday. Brown could not be reached. Nominees generally do not comment on their nominations while they are pending.
The committee on Thursday approved, also in an 11-9 party line vote, Ogletree Deakins shareholder Tom Farr for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday cleared the way for two nominees for the federal court in Atlanta to receive confirmation votes by the full Senate.
The panel voted 11-9 along party lines for Judge William Ray of the Georgia Court of Appeals. Michael Brown, an
The committee delayed a vote on Judge Tripp Self of the state Court of Appeals, who has been nominated to the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia.
Despite the split vote, the senators engaged in no debate over Ray. Democrats on the panel had quizzed Ray last month at a hearing over his opposition to a hate crime law when he was a Republican state senator.
Ray had explained that he opposed that bill because “it required that a judge was the one who was going to make the decision as to whether or not the defendant acted with some hate toward some particular identifiable group. And that was in direct contradiction to a United States Supreme Court decision … which said it had to be a jury decision.”
Ray also said the bill in question provided for no additional penalties. “I thought … it was simply a political statement,” he said, adding the bill had another problem. “It didn't really identify the groups … that were targeted. It could have been anyone.”
The liberal Alliance for Justice group had urged tough scrutiny of Ray, who was warmly supported by Georgia's Sens. Johnny Isakson and David Perdue, both Republicans.
Ray declined to comment on Friday. Brown could not be reached. Nominees generally do not comment on their nominations while they are pending.
The committee on Thursday approved, also in an 11-9 party line vote,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 2Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 3Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 4New Associates Yearbook 2024
- 5Disbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250