Kelley/Uustal Wins $5.3M Verdict in Rare Non-Engle Tobacco Case
Brenda Gentile belonged to a generation of smokers not covered by the Engle class: those who picked up filtered cigarettes in the 1970s.
October 23, 2017 at 03:22 PM
5 minute read
Fort Lauderdale attorneys won a rare $5.3 million wrongful death verdict for the family of a smoker who picked up her first cigarette in the 1970s — decades after most tobacco plaintiffs in Florida.
Brenda Gentile was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2014, placing her far outside the time frame of the Engle class, a group of plaintiffs diagnosed with smoking-related illnesses before 1996 who benefit from certain pre-determined jury findings.
Engle plaintiffs usually started smoking as teenagers in the 1950s. When the Florida Supreme Court disbanded the statewide Engle class action, the justices determined tobacco companies in those days conspired to hide the health effects of cigarettes. But the Gentile family's lawyers argued the tobacco industry's misconduct did not end there.
“She started smoking after warnings were on the packs,” said Kelley/Uustal partner Eric Rosen, who tried the case with associates Kimberly Wald and Josiah Graham. “But the the conspiracy to cast doubt and controversy over whether smoking was harmful and addictive that the cigarette companies created in the 1950s was ongoing during the time she was growing up and during her adult life.”
Gentile smoked Philip Morris USA brands throughout her life, starting with filtered Parliament cigarettes in high school and later moving on to low-tar Merit cigarettes, Rosen said. From the late 1980s until her death three years ago, she smoked Virginia Slim “ultra-light” cigarettes.
In trial against Philip Morris, Rosen pointed to internal documents showing the company knew people believed filtered or low-tar cigarettes were healthier than the unfiltered versions the generation before Gentile smoked.
“Their internal documents talked about how the Merit smoker is this health-conscious individual,” Rosen said. “They want to quit but they end up with Merits, because they can't quit.”
The “health-conscious” marketing often targeted young women like Gentile, Rosen argued, with the Virginia Slims brand positioned as a “long, white, feminine cigarette.” And when tested, filtered cigarettes registered low levels of nicotine and tar on machines.
“But people aren't machines,” Rosen said. “They smoke to get nicotine because they're addicted. So they smoke more deeply. They take bigger puffs, deeper puffs.”
The plaintiffs lawyers backed their argument with a body of research showing people who smoke filtered cigarettes are developing lung cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma, at high rates.
“Despite decreases in smoking prevalence and concomitant decreases in squamous cell carcinoma, the incidence of lung adenocarcinoma among smokers has increased since the 1960s,” a 2014 U.S. Surgeon General's report found. “Evidence from birth-cohort models and epidemiologic studies are sufficient to conclude that the increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma among smokers is due to changes in the design and/or composition of cigarettes.”
Philip Morris argued plaintiffs counsel did not show the cigarettes were defective or that consumers believed they were avoiding the risk of cancer or addiction by smoking filtered cigarettes.
“By the time Mrs. Gentile began smoking in 1972 or 1973 (and even in the 1950s), the public had available to it pervasive information about the health risks of smoking,” defense counsel wrote in a court filing. “At most, Plaintiff has presented evidence that consumers such as Mrs. Gentile believed that some types of cigarettes (notably “light”/low-tar cigarettes) were less risky than others. … He has not shown that consumers believed any conventional cigarettes … were actually safe.”
The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The jury awarded Gentile's family $7.1 million, finding the cigarettes were defective and that Philip Morris concealed the health effects and addictive nature of the products, leading to Gentile's lung cancer and death. Because the jury assigned Gentile 25 percent of the liability, the amount awarded by Palm Beach Circuit Judge Meenu Sasser in the final judgment was $5.3 million.
Rosen said he hopes the verdict opens the door for others who started smoking later than the Engle class.
“I hope they would pursue claims, because we can prove that the cigarettes are defective by design,” he said. “What we presented at trial and what the jury found was that the cigarettes were unreasonably dangerous to the consumer, and that the cigarette companies over the past few decades have incorporated design features that made the cigarettes much more dangerous.”
Case: Michael Gentile v. Philip Morris USA
Case No.: 50-2015-CA-005405
Description: Tobacco
Filing date: May 12, 2015
Verdict date: Oct. 10, 2017
Judge: Palm Beach Circuit Judge Meenu Sasser
Plaintiffs attorneys: Eric Rosen, Kimberly Wald and Josiah Graham, Kelley/Uustal, Fort Lauderdale
Defense attorneys: Frank Cruz-Alvarez and Rachel Forman, Miami, Kristopher Verra, Tampa, Shook, Hardy & Bacon; Keri Arnold, New York, Jason Ross, Tampa, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Verdict amount: $5.34 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250