Attorneys Fees Back in Play on $10.5 Million Tobacco Verdict
An appeals court rules certified mail rather than an email rightfully put a settlement offer in play, defeating tobacco industry attempts to kill attorney fees on a multimillion-dollar verdict.
October 25, 2017 at 02:55 PM
3 minute read
Cigarette makers in a products liability case failed Wednesday to show a procedural violation — a missing email — was sufficient to block attorney fees on a $10.5 million award to a late smoker's family.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. were defendants in a 2008 suit by John McCoy, a relative of a woman who died after years of heavy smoking.
Court records indicate they rejected a $200,000 settlement proposal made in February and July 2014. Later when a jury delivered the multimillion-dollar verdict, the companies returned to the proposed settlement to argue a plaintiffs attorney misstep should wipe out the claim for fees.
The main argument was a violation of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516. The companies claimed McCoy's attorneys served the settlement offers to each defendant by certified mail, then filed a notice of service by email but failed to actually email the documents.
Broward Circuit Judge John J. Murphy III agreed with the tobacco companies that McCoy failed to comply with the rule and denied his motion for fees.
But the Fourth District Court of Appeal disagreed, ruling the governing statute focuses on “actual notice,” which McCoy's attorneys provided.
“The defendants had actual knowledge of the proposals for the settlement and did not accept them,” Fourth DCA Judge Robert Gross wrote in a unanimous decision with Judges Cory Ciklin and Mark Klingensmith concurring. To “deny recovery because the initial offer was not e-mailed is to allow the procedural tail of the law to wag the substantive dog.”
The appellate court also found “an offer of judgment is not a pleading” and therefore falls outside the rule's email requirements. It then reversed the circuit court ruling that denied McCoy's motion.
Now attorney fees are back in play in the nearly decadelong case. In Florida, attorney fees can be sought when an award is above a plaintiffs settlement offer or below a defense offer. Tobacco attorneys have sought fees for years when juries award nothing to smokers or their survivors.
Court records list Scott P. Schlesinger and Jonathan Gdanski of the Schlesinger Law Offices in Fort Lauderdale and Alejandro Alvarez of the Alvarez Law Firm in Coral Gables as McCoy's trial attorneys.
On appeal, Schlesinger and Gdanski teamed with colleague Brittany Chambers, and Celene Humphries, Shea Moxon, Maegen Luka and Thomas Seider of Brannock & Humphries in Tampa.
“The defendants rejected the plaintiff's proposals for settlement despite the fact that the proposals were for less that the true value of the plaintiff's claims,” McCoy's attorneys wrote in an amended motion for fees and costs in 2016. ”The defendants … unreasonably refused to accept the plaintiff's proposals for settlement … and thereby unreasonably delayed and needlessly increased the cost of litigation in this case.”
Scott Michael Edson of King & Spalding in Washington, D.C., teamed with Val Leppert, William Durham II and Chad Peterson of King & Spalding in Atlanta and Stephanie Parker and John Walker of Jones Day in Atlanta to represent R.J. Reynolds and Lorillard. Geoffrey Michael of Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C., represented Philip Morris. They did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250