Regulators Sign Off on Duke Energy Deal
State regulators approved a wide-ranging settlement agreement that ends the possibility Duke Energy Florida will build a nuclear power plant…
October 26, 2017 at 03:11 PM
7 minute read
|
State regulators approved a wide-ranging settlement agreement that ends the possibility Duke Energy Florida will build a nuclear power plant in Levy County and helps nail down base electric rates through 2021.
The Florida Public Service Commission unanimously approved the deal, which Duke reached after months of negotiations with representatives of consumers and businesses and a clean-energy group. Along with addressing the long-controversial Levy County nuclear project and base rates, the settlement calls for the utility to undertake solar-energy projects.
“I think that this settlement, as a whole, benefits consumers and is ultimately in the public interest,” Commissioner Ronald Brise said before the vote.
The highest-profile part of the settlement involves the Levy nuclear project, which would have involved building two reactors and was rooted in a 2006 state law aimed at increasing the use of nuclear power in Florida. Duke announced in 2013 that it was shelving a plan to build the reactors, but it left open the possibility that it could pursue a nuclear project in the future and obtained key licenses.
The settlement, however, ends that possibility and calls for Duke to write off about $150 million in remaining costs instead of recouping them from customers.
“To me, probably the biggest selling point is the full exodus of Levy,” commission Chairwoman Julie Brown said. “Shareholders are going to be on the hook [for] costs associated with that proposal. Customers will never have to pay again.”
Javier Portuondo, a Duke official who oversees regulatory strategy for the utility, testified during Wednesday's meeting that other possible uses for the Levy site could include another type of power plant or solar facilities.
“We will entertain any use of that facility [site] that others might bring to the table,” he said. “So we're really open for considering any and all uses.”
Duke is the state's second-largest electric utility, with more than 1.8 million customers. The settlement was reached with the state Office of Public Counsel, which represents consumers in utility issues; the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, which includes large commercial customers; the Florida Retail Federation; PCS Phosphate; and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
The 52-page settlement will largely resolve issues about base electric rates through 2021. Base rates make up a major portion of customers' monthly electric bills, and proposals to increase rates often lead to lengthy — and contentious — hearings at the Public Service Commission.
Under the settlement, Duke will be able to raise base rates by $67 million a year from 2019 through 2021 and will not come back until at least 2021 to propose additional hikes. Portuondo said the settlement attempts to “smooth out” base-rate increases.
Charles Rehwinkel, deputy public counsel in the state Office of Public Counsel, said the three-year rate plan as part of the overall settlement was better for consumers than potentially going through a rate case in the future.
“We felt it was a better outcome for the customers than a litigated outcome,” Rehwinkel said. “So a negotiated outcome, better than a litigated outcome, equals a good settlement.”
A caveat to the base-rate issue is that costs for solar facilities can be added as the facilities are completed. Under the settlement, Duke commits to building 175 megawatts of solar-generation projects annually for four years.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
State regulators approved a wide-ranging settlement agreement that ends the possibility
The Florida Public Service Commission unanimously approved the deal, which Duke reached after months of negotiations with representatives of consumers and businesses and a clean-energy group. Along with addressing the long-controversial Levy County nuclear project and base rates, the settlement calls for the utility to undertake solar-energy projects.
“I think that this settlement, as a whole, benefits consumers and is ultimately in the public interest,” Commissioner Ronald Brise said before the vote.
The highest-profile part of the settlement involves the Levy nuclear project, which would have involved building two reactors and was rooted in a 2006 state law aimed at increasing the use of nuclear power in Florida. Duke announced in 2013 that it was shelving a plan to build the reactors, but it left open the possibility that it could pursue a nuclear project in the future and obtained key licenses.
The settlement, however, ends that possibility and calls for Duke to write off about $150 million in remaining costs instead of recouping them from customers.
“To me, probably the biggest selling point is the full exodus of Levy,” commission Chairwoman Julie Brown said. “Shareholders are going to be on the hook [for] costs associated with that proposal. Customers will never have to pay again.”
Javier Portuondo, a Duke official who oversees regulatory strategy for the utility, testified during Wednesday's meeting that other possible uses for the Levy site could include another type of power plant or solar facilities.
“We will entertain any use of that facility [site] that others might bring to the table,” he said. “So we're really open for considering any and all uses.”
Duke is the state's second-largest electric utility, with more than 1.8 million customers. The settlement was reached with the state Office of Public Counsel, which represents consumers in utility issues; the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, which includes large commercial customers; the Florida Retail Federation; PCS Phosphate; and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
The 52-page settlement will largely resolve issues about base electric rates through 2021. Base rates make up a major portion of customers' monthly electric bills, and proposals to increase rates often lead to lengthy — and contentious — hearings at the Public Service Commission.
Under the settlement, Duke will be able to raise base rates by $67 million a year from 2019 through 2021 and will not come back until at least 2021 to propose additional hikes. Portuondo said the settlement attempts to “smooth out” base-rate increases.
Charles Rehwinkel, deputy public counsel in the state Office of Public Counsel, said the three-year rate plan as part of the overall settlement was better for consumers than potentially going through a rate case in the future.
“We felt it was a better outcome for the customers than a litigated outcome,” Rehwinkel said. “So a negotiated outcome, better than a litigated outcome, equals a good settlement.”
A caveat to the base-rate issue is that costs for solar facilities can be added as the facilities are completed. Under the settlement, Duke commits to building 175 megawatts of solar-generation projects annually for four years.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Inflation Reduction Act: Evaluating Its Impact on Renewable Energy Producers and Analyzing Emerging Needs
Caribbean Energy Needs Are on the Rise, and Plenty of That Work is Headed For U.S. Law Firms
5 minute readJudge Dismisses Solar Power Startup from Lawsuit Alleging Fraud By Ex-CEO
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250