Meet Andrew Berman, the Man Attorneys Call When They're in Trouble
Andrew Berman's professional profile touts his appellate expertise, work in health care and business litigation, probate experience and national…
October 27, 2017 at 02:17 PM
8 minute read
Andrew Berman's professional profile touts his appellate expertise, work in health care and business litigation, probate experience and national accolades.
But it's his much smaller practice—niche work representing attorneys in crisis—that's earned him a reputation as a “fixer” in legal circles.
“This gives me the most satisfaction,” said Berman, who practices in state and federal courts. “You're really helping people who are in need. You're helping people start their careers, save their careers, or get back into their careers.”
Berman is senior partner at Young Berman Karpf & Gonzalez in Miami and Fort Lauderdale, where his primary focus is business litigation and appeals. But it's his work defending fellow lawyers facing public disgrace, criminal charges or loss of their livelihood that grabs headlines.
He made the news representing high-profile attorney Henry “Hank” Adorno, caught in a whirlwind scandal that caused the nation's largest minority-owned law firm, Adorno & Yoss, to implode after its principal faced charges for mishandling a class action.
Berman's latest headlines involve the representation of Jeremy Alters, a Dania Beach personal injury plaintiffs attorney suspended in December 2011 over allegations he misappropriated funds from his Miami law firm's trust accounts and used clients' funds to cover other obligations.
The Florida Supreme Court lifted the suspension in January 2012 and reinstated Alters' license to practice law. Then, court-appointed referee, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Marcia Caballero, found Alters guilty of two of the six charges against him but cleared him of willful misconduct. She recommended no disciplinary action after finding the attorney prevailed on the most serious counts, but that he failed to prevent repeated misconduct by others in his firm.
For years, Berman championed Alters in a fight against the Florida Bar, which sought to recover about $305,360 in prosecution costs. The effort paid off in September, when Caballero highlighted many “troubling features of the bar's disparate prosecutions.” Noting several missteps in the aggressive pursuit of Alters, the judge concluded it was the Florida Bar who owed the attorney—and not the other way around. She recommended the bar pay nearly $144,000 to cover his fees and expenses in fending off the litigation.
Berman doesn't like to talk about the case. A vague bullet point on his website appears to be the only reference to the hard-fought and ongoing fight and touches only on the early part of the litigation.
“Successfully overturned emergency suspension of prominent attorney by Florida Supreme Court within 30 days of suspension order,” the site notes.
Berman's ethics practice dates back to his days as a young attorney in the 1980s, when he worked for former Florida Bar President Burton Young, now his law partner. In those days he helped Burton on disciplinary cases, until lawyers started reaching out to him for representation on bar admissions and ethics.
“I feel the most pressure when I am convinced that a lawyer is innocent,” Berman said. “I fight long and hard to make sure that a bad result does not occur.”
His big breakthrough came while representing a well-connected attorney with ties to the White House.
The client was plaintiffs lawyer Hugh Rodham, whose sister is Hillary Clinton. He faced ethics charges for lobbying his powerful brother-in-law, then-President Bill Clinton, to commute the sentences of two men with felony convictions and ties to major Democratic campaign donors. Rodham took about $400,000 in fees from the men, who Clinton pardoned on his last day in office. The Clintons denied any knowledge of the payment and demanded Rodham return the money.
Berman helped Rodham beat the allegations. In 2001, the Florida Bar found Rodham did not violate ethics rules.
“We defeated that because he wasn't engaged in the practice of law,” Berman said. “Anyone could ask the president for a pardon. It was completely discretionary with the president.”
The media attention made him a noted litigator, but if he had his way, Berman would keep all his clients out of the spotlight.
“When I do my best work no one even knows about it,” he said. “It never gets to the point where something public occurs.”
Andrew Berman's professional profile touts his appellate expertise, work in health care and business litigation, probate experience and national accolades.
But it's his much smaller practice—niche work representing attorneys in crisis—that's earned him a reputation as a “fixer” in legal circles.
“This gives me the most satisfaction,” said Berman, who practices in state and federal courts. “You're really helping people who are in need. You're helping people start their careers, save their careers, or get back into their careers.”
Berman is senior partner at Young Berman Karpf & Gonzalez in Miami and Fort Lauderdale, where his primary focus is business litigation and appeals. But it's his work defending fellow lawyers facing public disgrace, criminal charges or loss of their livelihood that grabs headlines.
He made the news representing high-profile attorney Henry “Hank” Adorno, caught in a whirlwind scandal that caused the nation's largest minority-owned law firm,
Berman's latest headlines involve the representation of Jeremy Alters, a Dania Beach personal injury plaintiffs attorney suspended in December 2011 over allegations he misappropriated funds from his Miami law firm's trust accounts and used clients' funds to cover other obligations.
The Florida Supreme Court lifted the suspension in January 2012 and reinstated Alters' license to practice law. Then, court-appointed referee, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Marcia Caballero, found Alters guilty of two of the six charges against him but cleared him of willful misconduct. She recommended no disciplinary action after finding the attorney prevailed on the most serious counts, but that he failed to prevent repeated misconduct by others in his firm.
For years, Berman championed Alters in a fight against the Florida Bar, which sought to recover about $305,360 in prosecution costs. The effort paid off in September, when Caballero highlighted many “troubling features of the bar's disparate prosecutions.” Noting several missteps in the aggressive pursuit of Alters, the judge concluded it was the Florida Bar who owed the attorney—and not the other way around. She recommended the bar pay nearly $144,000 to cover his fees and expenses in fending off the litigation.
Berman doesn't like to talk about the case. A vague bullet point on his website appears to be the only reference to the hard-fought and ongoing fight and touches only on the early part of the litigation.
“Successfully overturned emergency suspension of prominent attorney by Florida Supreme Court within 30 days of suspension order,” the site notes.
Berman's ethics practice dates back to his days as a young attorney in the 1980s, when he worked for former Florida Bar President Burton Young, now his law partner. In those days he helped Burton on disciplinary cases, until lawyers started reaching out to him for representation on bar admissions and ethics.
“I feel the most pressure when I am convinced that a lawyer is innocent,” Berman said. “I fight long and hard to make sure that a bad result does not occur.”
His big breakthrough came while representing a well-connected attorney with ties to the White House.
The client was plaintiffs lawyer Hugh Rodham, whose sister is Hillary Clinton. He faced ethics charges for lobbying his powerful brother-in-law, then-President Bill Clinton, to commute the sentences of two men with felony convictions and ties to major Democratic campaign donors. Rodham took about $400,000 in fees from the men, who Clinton pardoned on his last day in office. The Clintons denied any knowledge of the payment and demanded Rodham return the money.
Berman helped Rodham beat the allegations. In 2001, the Florida Bar found Rodham did not violate ethics rules.
“We defeated that because he wasn't engaged in the practice of law,” Berman said. “Anyone could ask the president for a pardon. It was completely discretionary with the president.”
The media attention made him a noted litigator, but if he had his way, Berman would keep all his clients out of the spotlight.
“When I do my best work no one even knows about it,” he said. “It never gets to the point where something public occurs.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250