Broward Beach Battle Advances as Judge Draws Line in the Sand
Hillsboro Beach claims rock structures in the sand in Deerfield Beach are causing critical erosion.
October 31, 2017 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
Melanie Bell
Deerfield Beach and Hillsboro Beach are advancing in their court battle over — what else — the beach.
A Broward Circuit judge last week dismissed motions filed by Hillsboro Beach, which argued its beach is critically eroded because rock piles in neighboring Deerfield Beach to the north are capturing sand that would normally flow its way.
“There's hardly any beach there,” said Hillsboro Beach attorney Kenneth Oertel of Oertel, Fernandez, Bryant & Atkinson in Tallahassee. “I was there a few days ago, and the beach has washed away. There's hardly any left.”
Hillsboro Beach is challenging its neighbor's compliance with a state permit that addresses when erosion requires the adjustment of the 1960s rock structures called groins.
“The littoral drift in this area along the East Coast is from north to south,” Oertel said.
Deerfield Beach claims removal of the rock piles would erode its own public beach. Besides, Hillsboro Beach's three-mile private oceanfront stretch is doing just fine, attorneys argue.
“The photographs that we presented in court show that their beach is being renourished by Mother Nature significantly over the past two years,” said Deerfield Beach attorney Bill Scherer of Conrad & Scherer in Fort Lauderdale. “We think the lawsuit is frivolous, shouldn't have been brought and was brought in bad faith.”
The case is heading toward trial in October 2018 after Broward Circuit Judge David Haimes dismissed Hillsboro Beach's motions to strike affirmative defenses and dismiss a counterclaim. He declined to rule on a motion to strike a demand for a jury trial, saying he'll make the call later on.
Haimes also didn't address Hillsboro Beach's decision to bring the action “standing in the shoes” of the state, which granted the permit. But he said he accepted the argument that the counterclaim properly asks for a declaration of Deerfield Beach's rights.
“I think it's appropriate to seek a declaration of rights in this situation,” Haimes said at an Oct. 25 hearing.
The dispute has been going on since 2015, surviving two public hearings and a failed mediation before Hillsboro Beach filed a lawsuit in April. Florida designated a 3.2-mile stretch including south Deerfield Beach and all of Hillsboro Beach as “critically eroded,” according to a 2016 report.
The two municipalities used to work together to combat erosion, Scherer said. In decades past, Deerfield Beach agreed to modify rock piles and let its neighbor use its public access to bring sand to the private beach. But things changed.
“They had no intention to settle with us at all,” Scherer said. “We presume that their motives are to try to get some kind of reimbursement for sand renourishment that they can't get because they don't have public access.”
But Oertel said the fact that Hillsboro Beach has trucked in 1.3 million cubic yards of sand since the 1970s “speaks for itself.” The town received some state money through interlocal agreements with Deerfield Beach, but it has also spent millions of its own dollars on anti-erosion work, Oertel said.
“We just want them to fix the damage they're causing,” Oertel said. “I don't know what they mean by private beach. The beach is the beach. Private or public, they should fix it. It's really simple.”
Scherer is joined by Albert Frevola and Jessica Kopas of his firm.
Oertel is joined by Timothy Perry of his firm and William Spencer and Cindy Laquidara of Akerman in Fort Lauderdale.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250