Lewis Tein to Get $562,000 in Attorney Fees From Lawyer Bernardo Roman
Roman's client, the Miccosukee Tribe, covered the lion's share of the sanction, paying more than $2.66 million.
November 01, 2017 at 01:27 PM
3 minute read
Former Miccosukee tribal attorney Bernardo Roman III and his law firm owe Lewis Tein and its name partners $562,264 in attorney fees for more than five years of frivolous litigation, a judge ruled.
The decision follows an evidentiary hearing on the amount owed and came despite objections from Roman and his Miami law firm, Roman P.A., according to a final judgment by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John W. Thornton. It follows his Oct. 26 determination that Lewis Tein's request for nearly $3.23 million in fees was reasonable after years of aggressive litigation.
The court found Roman, his firm and the tribe liable for attorney fees in 2015 but didn't set the lawyer's portion of the sanction until last week.
Roman's client paid the lion's share of the sanctions, according to a notice of satisfaction filed in May 2016 showing the tribe paid more than $2.66 million.
It was an ironic twist in a case that began with Roman and his client trying to put Lewis Tein on the hook for millions of dollars.
The parties have been fighting since April 2, 2012, when Roman, on behalf of the small tribe in the Everglades west of Miami, filed a 324-page legal malpractice suit. Since then, court records show 79 hearings and 1,048 docket entries in the case.
The tribe alleged Lewis Tein and its partners, former U.S. Attorney Guy Lewis and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Tein, billed the tribe for millions in “fictitious, excessive, exorbitant and unsubstantiated legal fees.”
Exhibits included descriptions of Lewis' luxury car collection, art and multimillion-dollar real estate holdings to suggest the defendants acquired wealth by bilking the tribe.
Civil racketeering claims were accompanied by allegations the firm and attorneys conspired to implement a “sophisticated scheme to defraud the tribe” after falsely promising unique results and access to the U.S. Attorney's Office. The Miccosukees further alleged an unethical conflict as Lewis Tein represented the tribe as well as individual members with opposing interests.
The parties exchanged lawsuits, and Lewis Tein fired back, accusing the tribe of maliciously destroying the law firm.
The spat led to ethics charges against three plaintiff lawyers, including Roman, who faces disbarment in an ongoing disciplinary proceeding.
In June, the referee in Roman's case, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis, recommended the Florida Supreme Court find him guilty of 55 counts of violating 14 rules regulating the Florida Bar as he pursued charges against Lewis Tein.
That same referee recommended the high court also find Roman's colleague, Miami attorney Jose Maria “Pepe” Herrera, guilty of violating six rules during the litigation.
In January, the Florida Bar brought ethics charges against a third attorney, Miami lawyer Ramon Manuel Rodriguez, accused of knowingly filing and prosecuting the frivolous perjury case. Rodriguez spent years pursuing his claims that Tein and Lewis committed fraud against the court during a wrongful death suit against defendants from the Miccosukee Tribe, according to the bar complaint.
Roman did not respond to a request for comment. The tribe cut ties with him last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250