Miami-Based Hospice Chain Vitas Reaches $75M Medicare Claims Settlement
The settlement is the largest amount ever recovered from a hospice care provider under the False Claims Act.
November 01, 2017 at 11:40 AM
9 minute read
Miami-based care provider Vitas Hospice Services LLC and related companies reached a $75 million agreement with the federal government to settle claims of Medicare overbilling.
“Today's resolution represents the largest amount ever recovered under the False Claims Act from a provider of hospice services,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad Readler of the Justice Department's Civil Division on Monday. “Medicare's hospice benefit provides critical services to some of the most vulnerable Medicare patients, and the department will continue to ensure that this valuable benefit is used to assist those who need it, and not as an opportunity to line the pockets of those who seek to abuse it.”
Vitas is the largest for-profit hospice chain in the country and was purchased in 2004 by Cincinnati-based Chemed Corp. The agreement involves Chemed and subsidiaries including Vitas Hospice Services and Vitas Healthcare Corp., which operate out of 201 S. Biscayne Blvd. in downtown Miami.
“We've elected to settle the civil litigation without any admission of wrongdoing to avoid the cost and uncertainty of protracted litigation,” Vitas CEO Nick Westfall said in a statement. “We continue with our commitment, since the inception of the hospice benefit, to provide a comprehensive offering of compassionate, high-quality care to patients and families across the country.”
The settlement stems from allegations that Vitas billed Medicare for hospice services for patients who were not terminally ill. Vitas also billed the program for improperly delivered, unnecessary or fabricated home care services, the government claimed. The alleged false claims were filed between 2002 and 2013.
Under the law, care providers may only submit Medicare claims for hospice benefits for patients who are expected to die within six months. Electing the hospice benefit also means patients give up the right to curative care focused on treating an illness. The government claimed Vitas gave employees bonuses based on how many patients received hospice services — even if those patients could have benefited from curative care.
Vitas also incentivized employees to improperly bill Medicare for continuous home care services, as the program pays hundreds of dollars more per day for those services than routine hospice services, the government claimed.
The company ”used aggressive marketing tactics and pressured staff to increase the volume of continuous home care claims, without regard to whether the patients actually required this level of crisis care,” according to the Justice Department.
The settlement includes a five-year corporate integrity agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services.
Vitas said in a statement the company fully cooperated with the Justice Department but continues to disagree with the claims.
“This civil litigation concerned professional disagreement between physicians in reaching a terminal prognosis as well as physician judgment in determining appropriate levels of care,” the statement said.
The settlement stems from four lawsuits consolidated in the Western District of Missouri.
Vitas was represented by Hogan Lovells attorneys Peter Spivack in Washington, D.C., and Stephanie Carman in Miami, as well as Husch Blackwell attorneys Stacey Bowman in Denver and Harvey Tettlebaum in Jefferson City, Missouri.
Miami-based care provider Vitas Hospice Services LLC and related companies reached a $75 million agreement with the federal government to settle claims of Medicare overbilling.
“Today's resolution represents the largest amount ever recovered under the False Claims Act from a provider of hospice services,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad Readler of the Justice Department's Civil Division on Monday. “Medicare's hospice benefit provides critical services to some of the most vulnerable Medicare patients, and the department will continue to ensure that this valuable benefit is used to assist those who need it, and not as an opportunity to line the pockets of those who seek to abuse it.”
Vitas is the largest for-profit hospice chain in the country and was purchased in 2004 by Cincinnati-based Chemed Corp. The agreement involves Chemed and subsidiaries including Vitas Hospice Services and Vitas Healthcare Corp., which operate out of 201 S. Biscayne Blvd. in downtown Miami.
“We've elected to settle the civil litigation without any admission of wrongdoing to avoid the cost and uncertainty of protracted litigation,” Vitas CEO Nick Westfall said in a statement. “We continue with our commitment, since the inception of the hospice benefit, to provide a comprehensive offering of compassionate, high-quality care to patients and families across the country.”
The settlement stems from allegations that Vitas billed Medicare for hospice services for patients who were not terminally ill. Vitas also billed the program for improperly delivered, unnecessary or fabricated home care services, the government claimed. The alleged false claims were filed between 2002 and 2013.
Under the law, care providers may only submit Medicare claims for hospice benefits for patients who are expected to die within six months. Electing the hospice benefit also means patients give up the right to curative care focused on treating an illness. The government claimed Vitas gave employees bonuses based on how many patients received hospice services — even if those patients could have benefited from curative care.
Vitas also incentivized employees to improperly bill Medicare for continuous home care services, as the program pays hundreds of dollars more per day for those services than routine hospice services, the government claimed.
The company ”used aggressive marketing tactics and pressured staff to increase the volume of continuous home care claims, without regard to whether the patients actually required this level of crisis care,” according to the Justice Department.
The settlement includes a five-year corporate integrity agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services.
Vitas said in a statement the company fully cooperated with the Justice Department but continues to disagree with the claims.
“This civil litigation concerned professional disagreement between physicians in reaching a terminal prognosis as well as physician judgment in determining appropriate levels of care,” the statement said.
The settlement stems from four lawsuits consolidated in the Western District of Missouri.
Vitas was represented by
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250