Community Associations Fighting Back Against 'Zombie' Homes
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television.
November 02, 2017 at 11:19 AM
6 minute read
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television. Unfortunately, many community associations are now finding themselves dealing with “zombie” homes. A zombie home is created by a lender which begins but does not complete a foreclosure combined with an owner walking away from the property. Lenders often delay their own foreclosure proceedings to avoid taking title to the property for as long as possible and the obligation to pay assessments that comes along with it. They look to profit at the association's expense.
Zombie homes reduce the values of neighboring properties and keep community associations from collecting badly needed assessments which will likely never be recouped. Zombie properties can remain in limbo for months or even years. In some instances zombie properties have been taken over by squatters, causing security and other problems for associations and their residents.
To combat these problems, community associations can file their own foreclosure on zombie properties. Such a lawsuit requires the association to invest both time and money which, again, may never be recovered. Association foreclosures often result in the association itself obtaining title to the unit since purchasers generally are unwilling to buy units with little if any equity subject to a first mortgage, although third parties sometimes bid at public sales thereby allowing the association to recoup some money. Associations that take title to a zombie property can cover assessments owed and sometimes make a small profit by renting a property if it is in good shape and located in a positive rental market. If not, merely owning a unit does not generally benefit the association as the association becomes responsible for maintaining the zombie home, while losing out on assessments.
In addition to a foreclosure action, community associations now have the means to file a complaint regarding zombie homes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in 2010 to, among other things, protect homeowners from dealing with unscrupulous mortgage servicers. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the CFPB to facilitate the coordinated collection, monitoring and response to consumer complaints regarding certain financial products and services. Consumers may file a complaint—including complaints about zombie homes in their community—through CFBP's online portal http://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/. This gives community association members an opportunity to complain about unreasonable delays brought about by financial institutions.
Further instructions on how to file a complaint with the CFPD are available on the Community Associations Institute's website,https://www.caionline.org/Advocacy/MortgageMatters/CFPBcomplaint/Pages/Howtofile.aspx.
The Community Associations Institute is tracking the complaint data to assist it in advocacy efforts before Congress.
Jed Frankel is a partner with Eisinger, Brown, Lewis, Frankel & Chaiet in Hollywood. He focuses his practice on community association and dispute resolution. Contact him at [email protected].
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television. Unfortunately, many community associations are now finding themselves dealing with “zombie” homes. A zombie home is created by a lender which begins but does not complete a foreclosure combined with an owner walking away from the property. Lenders often delay their own foreclosure proceedings to avoid taking title to the property for as long as possible and the obligation to pay assessments that comes along with it. They look to profit at the association's expense.
Zombie homes reduce the values of neighboring properties and keep community associations from collecting badly needed assessments which will likely never be recouped. Zombie properties can remain in limbo for months or even years. In some instances zombie properties have been taken over by squatters, causing security and other problems for associations and their residents.
To combat these problems, community associations can file their own foreclosure on zombie properties. Such a lawsuit requires the association to invest both time and money which, again, may never be recovered. Association foreclosures often result in the association itself obtaining title to the unit since purchasers generally are unwilling to buy units with little if any equity subject to a first mortgage, although third parties sometimes bid at public sales thereby allowing the association to recoup some money. Associations that take title to a zombie property can cover assessments owed and sometimes make a small profit by renting a property if it is in good shape and located in a positive rental market. If not, merely owning a unit does not generally benefit the association as the association becomes responsible for maintaining the zombie home, while losing out on assessments.
In addition to a foreclosure action, community associations now have the means to file a complaint regarding zombie homes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in 2010 to, among other things, protect homeowners from dealing with unscrupulous mortgage servicers. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the CFPB to facilitate the coordinated collection, monitoring and response to consumer complaints regarding certain financial products and services. Consumers may file a complaint—including complaints about zombie homes in their community—through CFBP's online portal http://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/. This gives community association members an opportunity to complain about unreasonable delays brought about by financial institutions.
Further instructions on how to file a complaint with the CFPD are available on the Community Associations Institute's website,https://www.caionline.org/Advocacy/MortgageMatters/CFPBcomplaint/Pages/Howtofile.aspx.
The Community Associations Institute is tracking the complaint data to assist it in advocacy efforts before Congress.
Jed Frankel is a partner with Eisinger, Brown,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250