Community Associations Fighting Back Against 'Zombie' Homes
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television.
November 02, 2017 at 11:19 AM
6 minute read
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television. Unfortunately, many community associations are now finding themselves dealing with “zombie” homes. A zombie home is created by a lender which begins but does not complete a foreclosure combined with an owner walking away from the property. Lenders often delay their own foreclosure proceedings to avoid taking title to the property for as long as possible and the obligation to pay assessments that comes along with it. They look to profit at the association's expense.
Zombie homes reduce the values of neighboring properties and keep community associations from collecting badly needed assessments which will likely never be recouped. Zombie properties can remain in limbo for months or even years. In some instances zombie properties have been taken over by squatters, causing security and other problems for associations and their residents.
To combat these problems, community associations can file their own foreclosure on zombie properties. Such a lawsuit requires the association to invest both time and money which, again, may never be recovered. Association foreclosures often result in the association itself obtaining title to the unit since purchasers generally are unwilling to buy units with little if any equity subject to a first mortgage, although third parties sometimes bid at public sales thereby allowing the association to recoup some money. Associations that take title to a zombie property can cover assessments owed and sometimes make a small profit by renting a property if it is in good shape and located in a positive rental market. If not, merely owning a unit does not generally benefit the association as the association becomes responsible for maintaining the zombie home, while losing out on assessments.
In addition to a foreclosure action, community associations now have the means to file a complaint regarding zombie homes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in 2010 to, among other things, protect homeowners from dealing with unscrupulous mortgage servicers. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the CFPB to facilitate the coordinated collection, monitoring and response to consumer complaints regarding certain financial products and services. Consumers may file a complaint—including complaints about zombie homes in their community—through CFBP's online portal http://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/. This gives community association members an opportunity to complain about unreasonable delays brought about by financial institutions.
Further instructions on how to file a complaint with the CFPD are available on the Community Associations Institute's website,https://www.caionline.org/Advocacy/MortgageMatters/CFPBcomplaint/Pages/Howtofile.aspx.
The Community Associations Institute is tracking the complaint data to assist it in advocacy efforts before Congress.
Jed Frankel is a partner with Eisinger, Brown, Lewis, Frankel & Chaiet in Hollywood. He focuses his practice on community association and dispute resolution. Contact him at [email protected].
Zombies are fictional undead beings created from the reanimation of a human corpse popular in movies and on television. Unfortunately, many community associations are now finding themselves dealing with “zombie” homes. A zombie home is created by a lender which begins but does not complete a foreclosure combined with an owner walking away from the property. Lenders often delay their own foreclosure proceedings to avoid taking title to the property for as long as possible and the obligation to pay assessments that comes along with it. They look to profit at the association's expense.
Zombie homes reduce the values of neighboring properties and keep community associations from collecting badly needed assessments which will likely never be recouped. Zombie properties can remain in limbo for months or even years. In some instances zombie properties have been taken over by squatters, causing security and other problems for associations and their residents.
To combat these problems, community associations can file their own foreclosure on zombie properties. Such a lawsuit requires the association to invest both time and money which, again, may never be recovered. Association foreclosures often result in the association itself obtaining title to the unit since purchasers generally are unwilling to buy units with little if any equity subject to a first mortgage, although third parties sometimes bid at public sales thereby allowing the association to recoup some money. Associations that take title to a zombie property can cover assessments owed and sometimes make a small profit by renting a property if it is in good shape and located in a positive rental market. If not, merely owning a unit does not generally benefit the association as the association becomes responsible for maintaining the zombie home, while losing out on assessments.
In addition to a foreclosure action, community associations now have the means to file a complaint regarding zombie homes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in 2010 to, among other things, protect homeowners from dealing with unscrupulous mortgage servicers. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the CFPB to facilitate the coordinated collection, monitoring and response to consumer complaints regarding certain financial products and services. Consumers may file a complaint—including complaints about zombie homes in their community—through CFBP's online portal http://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/. This gives community association members an opportunity to complain about unreasonable delays brought about by financial institutions.
Further instructions on how to file a complaint with the CFPD are available on the Community Associations Institute's website,https://www.caionline.org/Advocacy/MortgageMatters/CFPBcomplaint/Pages/Howtofile.aspx.
The Community Associations Institute is tracking the complaint data to assist it in advocacy efforts before Congress.
Jed Frankel is a partner with Eisinger, Brown,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250