3 Real Estate Investors Accused of Rigging Foreclosure Auctions
These are the first Florida indictments related to bid rigging in foreclosure auctions.
November 03, 2017 at 10:37 AM
9 minute read
|
A federal grand jury in West Palm Beach indicted three South Florida real estate investors for allegedly conspiring to rig bids in foreclosure auctions.
Prosecutors say high-volume investors Avi Stern, Christopher Graeve and Stuart Hankin conspired to rig bids submitted for online foreclosure sales in Palm Beach County from at least January 2012 until June 2015.
“These are the first indictments related to bid rigging in foreclosure auctions filed in Florida by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division,” the DOJ said in a release Friday.
Graeve and Hankin co-founded Prodigy Capital Inc. in Palm Beach Gardens in 2010. Graeve is chairman and Hankin is CEO, according to the company website.
Hankin hired attorney David Oscar Markus, of Markus/Moss in Miami, who has prevailed in at least three similar DOJ cases alleging bid rigging in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
“Stu is innocent,” Markus said. “He bought properties through an online auction like eBay in which anyone in the country could bid. No one controlled the market, nor could they.”
The investors face allegations in federal court that they worked together to control bids and prices, and ensured they submitted the winning offers.
“These charges demonstrate that the Antitrust Division will uncover and prosecute collusion by real estate investors, regardless of whether their conduct is carried out in person, or in texts, online chats or through other electronic means,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim. “The division will continue to work closely with our law enforcement colleagues to prosecute those responsible for taking money that would otherwise have gone to mortgage holders, Palm Beach County, and in some cases, to the owners of foreclosed homes.”
Markus accused the Justice Department of using the case to bolster the Antitrust Division's statistics, not to pursue justice.
“These properties were sold at fair prices,” he said. “Despite the inflammatory language in the prosecution's press release claiming the case concerns fraud and ill-gotten gains, the indictment makes no such claim.”
Graeve has been in the industry for 16 years, working under his father's mentorship, and Hankin graduated from Cornell University with a bachelor's degree in operations research and information engineering, according to the site. Prodigy's marketing material says the company uses a “proprietary formula” and strategic management to acquire real estate through auction for later sale.
Graeve's attorney, Harry Dohn Williams Jr. of the Law Office of H. Dohn Williams Jr. in Fort Lauderdale and Boca Raton, said his client is one of the largest bidders on foreclosed properties in Palm Beach and came under scrutiny because of his high-volume business. But he said the charging documents lack detail.
“The indictment doesn't give you any clue as to what properties this conduct allegedly involves,” Williams said. “It doesn't really tell you what transactions they're talking about. My client's company has been on hundreds of properties during this period.”
Stern's lawyer is Jeffrey Neiman of Marcus, Neiman & Rashbaum in Miami and Fort Lauderdale. He said his client and other investors bolstered—not hurt—the real estate sector.
“But for real estate investors like Avi, the housing market would have completely crashed,” Neiman said in an email. “The housing bubble was created by the same banks the government now claims to be victims. They could not be further from victims. The foreclosure auctions are done online and they are open to everyone. It is impossible for anyone, especially Avi, to have controlled the market. Avi is innocent of the charge and it will be proven so.”
Stern was affiliated with Florida's Best Realty Services in Boca Raton, but he no longer works for the company, according to a person who answered the phone there Friday morning. The real estate firm's website describes him as “a well-accomplished residential real estate investor, builder, flipper, landlord and agent” in Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Deerfield Beach and Fort Lauderdale.
Stern was the recent subject of a local television news report by WFLX Fox 29 in West Palm Beach about online foreclosure auctions in which he bid $125,400 on a distressed property.
“It's definitely a lot more convenient,” the news report quoted Stern as saying. “I'm able to work from my office and have more information in front of me, and not have to go to the Palm Beach County Courthouse.”
The Justice Department's Antitrust Division has brought similar bid rigging cases in Alabama, California, Georgia and North Carolina, securing more than 100 guilty pleas and convictions in those states.
“Real estate investors who think they can swindle the system to line their pockets with ill-gotten gains beware,” said Assistant Special Agent in Charge Paul Keenan of the FBI Miami's Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners will vigorously investigate such schemes.”
|
A federal grand jury in West Palm Beach indicted three South Florida real estate investors for allegedly conspiring to rig bids in foreclosure auctions.
Prosecutors say high-volume investors Avi Stern, Christopher Graeve and Stuart Hankin conspired to rig bids submitted for online foreclosure sales in Palm Beach County from at least January 2012 until June 2015.
“These are the first indictments related to bid rigging in foreclosure auctions filed in Florida by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division,” the DOJ said in a release Friday.
Graeve and Hankin co-founded Prodigy Capital Inc. in Palm Beach Gardens in 2010. Graeve is chairman and Hankin is CEO, according to the company website.
Hankin hired attorney David Oscar Markus, of Markus/Moss in Miami, who has prevailed in at least three similar DOJ cases alleging bid rigging in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
“Stu is innocent,” Markus said. “He bought properties through an online auction like eBay in which anyone in the country could bid. No one controlled the market, nor could they.”
The investors face allegations in federal court that they worked together to control bids and prices, and ensured they submitted the winning offers.
“These charges demonstrate that the Antitrust Division will uncover and prosecute collusion by real estate investors, regardless of whether their conduct is carried out in person, or in texts, online chats or through other electronic means,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim. “The division will continue to work closely with our law enforcement colleagues to prosecute those responsible for taking money that would otherwise have gone to mortgage holders, Palm Beach County, and in some cases, to the owners of foreclosed homes.”
Markus accused the Justice Department of using the case to bolster the Antitrust Division's statistics, not to pursue justice.
“These properties were sold at fair prices,” he said. “Despite the inflammatory language in the prosecution's press release claiming the case concerns fraud and ill-gotten gains, the indictment makes no such claim.”
Graeve has been in the industry for 16 years, working under his father's mentorship, and Hankin graduated from Cornell University with a bachelor's degree in operations research and information engineering, according to the site. Prodigy's marketing material says the company uses a “proprietary formula” and strategic management to acquire real estate through auction for later sale.
Graeve's attorney, Harry Dohn Williams Jr. of the Law Office of H. Dohn Williams Jr. in Fort Lauderdale and Boca Raton, said his client is one of the largest bidders on foreclosed properties in Palm Beach and came under scrutiny because of his high-volume business. But he said the charging documents lack detail.
“The indictment doesn't give you any clue as to what properties this conduct allegedly involves,” Williams said. “It doesn't really tell you what transactions they're talking about. My client's company has been on hundreds of properties during this period.”
Stern's lawyer is Jeffrey Neiman of Marcus, Neiman & Rashbaum in Miami and Fort Lauderdale. He said his client and other investors bolstered—not hurt—the real estate sector.
“But for real estate investors like Avi, the housing market would have completely crashed,” Neiman said in an email. “The housing bubble was created by the same banks the government now claims to be victims. They could not be further from victims. The foreclosure auctions are done online and they are open to everyone. It is impossible for anyone, especially Avi, to have controlled the market. Avi is innocent of the charge and it will be proven so.”
Stern was affiliated with Florida's Best Realty Services in Boca Raton, but he no longer works for the company, according to a person who answered the phone there Friday morning. The real estate firm's website describes him as “a well-accomplished residential real estate investor, builder, flipper, landlord and agent” in Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Deerfield Beach and Fort Lauderdale.
Stern was the recent subject of a local television news report by WFLX Fox 29 in West Palm Beach about online foreclosure auctions in which he bid $125,400 on a distressed property.
“It's definitely a lot more convenient,” the news report quoted Stern as saying. “I'm able to work from my office and have more information in front of me, and not have to go to the Palm Beach County Courthouse.”
The Justice Department's Antitrust Division has brought similar bid rigging cases in Alabama, California, Georgia and North Carolina, securing more than 100 guilty pleas and convictions in those states.
“Real estate investors who think they can swindle the system to line their pockets with ill-gotten gains beware,” said Assistant Special Agent in Charge Paul Keenan of the FBI Miami's Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners will vigorously investigate such schemes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250