Miami Restaurant and Fish Market on the Hook for $2M After Crash
The jury verdict came after years of arguments on an interesting vicarious liability issue.
November 06, 2017 at 12:48 PM
11 minute read
J. Albert Diaz/ALM.
A federal jury found a family-owned Miami River restaurant and fish market liable for $2 million after the owner's teenage son caused a car crash.
The Oct. 6 damages verdict came after years of work by plaintiffs attorney Juan Carlos Montes to answer a tricky liability question: When the 19-year-old driver crashed, was he running errands for his family's business — or just for his family?
If Lazaro E. Sanchez was on the clock for Casablanca Seafood Bar & Grill and the Casablanca Fish Market, the companies would be vicariously liable for any damages he caused when his truck hit pizza delivery driver Julia Padron's car in 2013.
Padron's car spun around and one end landed on top of a nearby Mercedes, said Montes, Padron's lawyer. Ankle, hip and rib injuries from the crash left her using a walker and sometimes a wheelchair, he said.
“She can't work,” said Montes of Montes & Associates Law Firm in Miramar. “She's older — she was 59 when the accident happened.”
But if Sanchez was picking up younger relatives from school as he claimed, Padron's recovery would be limited. Sanchez's father had already been released from liability as the owner of the truck when the auto insurance provider paid out $100,000 after the crash.
The federal case started in 2015 when Wilshire Insurance Co., which insures one of the family's restaurants — Casablanca on the Bay — asked for a declaratory judgment finding Sanchez was running personal errands at the time of the crash.
Wilshire argued the young man started out heading to Best Buy to purchase a TV for Casablanca on the Bay, but changed course when a family member asked him to pick up her kids from school, Montes said.
“The initial problem with that story is that this [crash] happened Dec. 23, 2013, and St. Theresa School had been closed since the week before,” Montes said.
The plaintiffs attorney was skeptical and put in “a lot of hours” investigating the family and the route of Sanchez's car to argue he was either heading back to the restaurant or to Best Buy when he hit Padron.
The case went to its first trial in 2016 to determine whether Sanchez was in the scope of his employment at the time of the crash. A week before the trial, Wilshire paid out its $1 million policy, releasing the Midtown restaurant Casablanca on the Bay.
But the other two Casablanca companies were still in play, and the jury found Sanchez was acting within the scope of his employment for the fish market and as an agent for the seafood restaurant. The case then headed to a second trial on liability and damages for the crash.
The Friday before trial started last month, the two companies conceded they were at least partially liable for the crash. But they still wanted a jury to hear arguments on Padron's comparative negligence and damages.
The defense said Sanchez was heading east on South Waterway Drive to make a left turn on 67th Avenue, and traffic was backed up about three blocks to Bird Road. Sanchez said he stopped at the stop sign and then a driver in the car next to Padron's waved him into the intersection, Sanchez said.
“He said he was sitting there for 15 seconds and then my client — boom — ran into him,” Montes said.
But the driver of the car near Padron's testified she saw Sanchez looking north and not stopping. Once she realized he was going to roll through the stop sign, she hit her brakes and barely missed him, she said.
Montes argued Padron's view was blocked by that car, with a plaintiffs expert opining by the time Padron saw Sanchez's truck, she had no time to react. Another driver who saw the crash from a different angle also testified Sanchez never stopped.
Meanwhile, many of the defense expert's opinions were “gutted” by a Daubert motion Montes filed, he said, and ultimately the expert was not called.
Jurors found Sanchez 100 percent liable for the crash. They awarded Padron $2 million, including about $1.03 million for pain and suffering, $850,000 for medical expenses and assistive care and $120,000 for lost earnings.
Montes said the defendants might be entitled to set-offs based on the previous insurance payouts.
Defense attorneys Raquel Reyes-Lao of Friedman Rodman & Frank in Miami, who represented the seafood bar and grill, and Steven Chackman of Bernstein Chackman Liss in Hollywood, who represented the fish market, did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
“It wasn't an easy case,” Montes said. “I think preparation and detailed work and filing things on time and filing the Daubert motion helped us. It was a lot of work.”
Case: Julia Padron v. Casablanca Fish Market et al
Case no.: 15-21644-CV-SCOLA
Description: Auto negligence
Filing date: April 30, 2015
Verdict date: Oct. 6, 2017
Judge: U.S. District Judge Robert Scola
Plaintiffs attorney: Juan Carlos Montes, Montes & Associates Law Firm, Miramar
Defense attorneys: Raquel Reyes-Lao and Stephanie Vega Graves, Friedman Rodman & Frank, Miami; Steven Chackman, Bernstein Chackman Liss, Hollywood
Verdict amount: $2 million
J.
A federal jury found a family-owned Miami River restaurant and fish market liable for $2 million after the owner's teenage son caused a car crash.
The Oct. 6 damages verdict came after years of work by plaintiffs attorney Juan Carlos Montes to answer a tricky liability question: When the 19-year-old driver crashed, was he running errands for his family's business — or just for his family?
If Lazaro E. Sanchez was on the clock for Casablanca Seafood Bar & Grill and the Casablanca Fish Market, the companies would be vicariously liable for any damages he caused when his truck hit pizza delivery driver Julia Padron's car in 2013.
Padron's car spun around and one end landed on top of a nearby Mercedes, said Montes, Padron's lawyer. Ankle, hip and rib injuries from the crash left her using a walker and sometimes a wheelchair, he said.
“She can't work,” said Montes of Montes & Associates Law Firm in Miramar. “She's older — she was 59 when the accident happened.”
But if Sanchez was picking up younger relatives from school as he claimed, Padron's recovery would be limited. Sanchez's father had already been released from liability as the owner of the truck when the auto insurance provider paid out $100,000 after the crash.
The federal case started in 2015 when Wilshire Insurance Co., which insures one of the family's restaurants — Casablanca on the Bay — asked for a declaratory judgment finding Sanchez was running personal errands at the time of the crash.
Wilshire argued the young man started out heading to
“The initial problem with that story is that this [crash] happened Dec. 23, 2013, and St. Theresa School had been closed since the week before,” Montes said.
The plaintiffs attorney was skeptical and put in “a lot of hours” investigating the family and the route of Sanchez's car to argue he was either heading back to the restaurant or to
The case went to its first trial in 2016 to determine whether Sanchez was in the scope of his employment at the time of the crash. A week before the trial, Wilshire paid out its $1 million policy, releasing the Midtown restaurant Casablanca on the Bay.
But the other two Casablanca companies were still in play, and the jury found Sanchez was acting within the scope of his employment for the fish market and as an agent for the seafood restaurant. The case then headed to a second trial on liability and damages for the crash.
The Friday before trial started last month, the two companies conceded they were at least partially liable for the crash. But they still wanted a jury to hear arguments on Padron's comparative negligence and damages.
The defense said Sanchez was heading east on South Waterway Drive to make a left turn on 67th Avenue, and traffic was backed up about three blocks to Bird Road. Sanchez said he stopped at the stop sign and then a driver in the car next to Padron's waved him into the intersection, Sanchez said.
“He said he was sitting there for 15 seconds and then my client — boom — ran into him,” Montes said.
But the driver of the car near Padron's testified she saw Sanchez looking north and not stopping. Once she realized he was going to roll through the stop sign, she hit her brakes and barely missed him, she said.
Montes argued Padron's view was blocked by that car, with a plaintiffs expert opining by the time Padron saw Sanchez's truck, she had no time to react. Another driver who saw the crash from a different angle also testified Sanchez never stopped.
Meanwhile, many of the defense expert's opinions were “gutted” by a Daubert motion Montes filed, he said, and ultimately the expert was not called.
Jurors found Sanchez 100 percent liable for the crash. They awarded Padron $2 million, including about $1.03 million for pain and suffering, $850,000 for medical expenses and assistive care and $120,000 for lost earnings.
Montes said the defendants might be entitled to set-offs based on the previous insurance payouts.
Defense attorneys Raquel Reyes-Lao of Friedman Rodman & Frank in Miami, who represented the seafood bar and grill, and Steven Chackman of Bernstein Chackman Liss in Hollywood, who represented the fish market, did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
“It wasn't an easy case,” Montes said. “I think preparation and detailed work and filing things on time and filing the Daubert motion helped us. It was a lot of work.”
Case: Julia Padron v. Casablanca Fish Market et al
Case no.: 15-21644-CV-SCOLA
Description: Auto negligence
Filing date: April 30, 2015
Verdict date: Oct. 6, 2017
Judge: U.S. District Judge Robert Scola
Plaintiffs attorney: Juan Carlos Montes, Montes & Associates Law Firm, Miramar
Defense attorneys: Raquel Reyes-Lao and Stephanie Vega Graves, Friedman Rodman & Frank, Miami; Steven Chackman, Bernstein Chackman Liss, Hollywood
Verdict amount: $2 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250