Clerks Audit Foreclosure Auction Systems After Bid-Rigging Indictment
Clerks are auditing the judicial foreclosure sale procedures to look for vulnerabilities in the system following a bid-rigging indictment.
November 08, 2017 at 01:39 PM
3 minute read
Palm Beach Clerk & Comptroller Sharon Bock is taking no chances.
As a federal grand jury indicted three high-volume investors for allegedly rigging auctions, Bock and her staff audited Palm Beach County's procedures to look for vulnerabilities in the judicial foreclosure sales process.
Prosecutors didn't allege a system failure or breach in the technology used by Palm Beach Circuit Court to host online real estate auctions. The indictment instead claimed investors Avi Stern, Christopher Graeve and Stuart Hankin conspired to rig bids submitted for judicial sales from at least January 2012 to June 2015.
Bock and her South Florida counterpart, Miami-Dade Clerk Harvey Ruvin, took precautionary measures. The inspector general in the Palm Beach County Clerk's Office reevaluated all procedures to ensure compliance with statutory requirements, while the clerk worked with its auction software vendor, Grant Street Group, to search for potential weak spots. Miami-Dade undertook an internal audit.
“Our job is to create a fair and level playing field for anybody that enters the justice system,” Bock said. “There are many, many safeguards built in.”
Online foreclosure auctions are fairly new to Florida, one of the states hardest hit in the 2008 housing market collapse. At the height of the crisis, tens of thousands of new foreclosures flooded the courts each month. In 2009, lenders filed more than 64,000 foreclosure suits in Miami-Dade County alone, and by the end 2010, nearly 82,000 cases were pending in circuit court. In Broward County, judges juggled about 29,000 new lawsuits in 2010, and the backlog ballooned to more 43,000 pending cases by July 2012.
The caseload forced administrators to seek more efficient ways to handle judicial sales, which once took place on courthouse steps with cash transactions.
“I'll tell you there was collusion back then,” said Bock. “If you just look at white-collar crime … anywhere the potential exists for making money, you're always going to find somebody who's going to try to the game the system.”
Palm Beach County adopted an electronic platform in 2013, allowing bidders to participate in online auctions. Participants were required to register, identify themselves, submit deposits of 5 percent of their highest intended bid and agree to forfeit deposits if they violated auction rules.
But prosecutors allege three investors found a way to circumvent the system by working together offline to control bids and ensure they submitted winning offers.
“These are the first indictments related to bid rigging in foreclosure auctions filed in Florida by the Justice Department's antitrust division,” the DOJ said in a release issued Nov. 3.
Attorneys for all three defendants said the investors purchased auctioned properties at fair prices on an open market and committed no crimes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250