Florida Suing Drug Company Over Stock Losses
Acting on its own, Florida will take on an international pharmaceutical company, alleging the state's pension fund lost more than $62 million in stock…
November 08, 2017 at 03:07 PM
13 minute read
Acting on its own, Florida will take on an international pharmaceutical company, alleging the state's pension fund lost more than $62 million in stock value because of federal securities violations by the company.
Gov. Rick Scott, Attorney General Pam Bondi and state Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, who comprise the State Board of Administration, agreed Tuesday to hire a New York-based law firm to take on Canada-based Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., rather than participate in a class action lawsuit with other stockholders.
Valeant has been accused of violating federal securities regulations by marking up drug prices and then selling the drugs through a pharmacy network, without disclosing the full scope of the transactions to stockholders.
Ash Williams, executive director of the State Board of Administration, said the state may not recover all $62 million but maintained Florida could do better in terms of recovery than being part of the class action.
“I think we'll get a higher proportion out of our losses this way than if we had stayed in the class,” Williams said after the Cabinet meeting. “And whatever the recovery is, we'll get to keep more of it because we'll have better terms.”
Valeant is facing numerous lawsuits, including an $80 billion claim filed in August by Lord Abbett & Co., a mutual fund firm.
Wanting to review law firms that could handle the case, Bondi asked for a delay last month in hiring the firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. Terms have yet to be finalized, but Williams said the firm is asking for a percent of any reward above what the state could receive from being involved in a victorious class action suit.
Bondi declined to say Tuesday what, from her review of the case, made her agree to proceed with the solo approach.
“We feel we have enough to go forward, and we're very pleased that we are,” Bondi said after a state Cabinet meeting.
The case is expected to be filed in federal court in New Jersey, where the company has its U.S. headquarters.
In a report to the state, Bernstein Litowitz said Florida's $154 billion pension fund “incurred significant damages as a result of the fraudulent misrepresentations at Valeant.” The law firm identified at least $62 million in “potential recoverable damages,” based on Valeant stock transactions between January 2013 and August 2016.
In a review of records at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the law firm said the Florida losses were “among the largest of any public fund investor.”
About $7.5 million of the Valeant transactions were on the Canadian stock exchange, which is not expected to be the focus of the lawsuit.
In an indication of how much Florida might recover from the litigation, Bernstein Litowitz said it recovered 37.5 percent of investors' estimated damages in a securities lawsuit against the Cendant Corp. and 18.5 percent of investors' claims against the Biovail Corp.
Both were class action lawsuits and Bernstein Litowitz noted it “has achieved substantially higher recovery percentages when selectively representing prominent institutional investors (including the SBA) in direct actions.”
In releasing its third-quarter numbers on Tuesday, Joseph Papa, the chief executive officer of the embattled company, highlighted Valeant's “continued progress.”
“Valeant is a very different company today than it was a year ago. Under a new management team, we have strengthened our balance sheet and stabilized the company by simplifying our business and allocating resources more efficiently,” Papa said in a statement. “We realize there is more progress to be made, and we will continue to hold ourselves accountable for delivering on our commitments to best serve our shareholders, employees, customers, and most importantly, patients.”
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
Acting on its own, Florida will take on an international pharmaceutical company, alleging the state's pension fund lost more than $62 million in stock value because of federal securities violations by the company.
Gov. Rick Scott, Attorney General Pam Bondi and state Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, who comprise the State Board of Administration, agreed Tuesday to hire a New York-based law firm to take on Canada-based
Valeant has been accused of violating federal securities regulations by marking up drug prices and then selling the drugs through a pharmacy network, without disclosing the full scope of the transactions to stockholders.
Ash Williams, executive director of the State Board of Administration, said the state may not recover all $62 million but maintained Florida could do better in terms of recovery than being part of the class action.
“I think we'll get a higher proportion out of our losses this way than if we had stayed in the class,” Williams said after the Cabinet meeting. “And whatever the recovery is, we'll get to keep more of it because we'll have better terms.”
Valeant is facing numerous lawsuits, including an $80 billion claim filed in August by Lord Abbett & Co., a mutual fund firm.
Wanting to review law firms that could handle the case, Bondi asked for a delay last month in hiring the firm
Bondi declined to say Tuesday what, from her review of the case, made her agree to proceed with the solo approach.
“We feel we have enough to go forward, and we're very pleased that we are,” Bondi said after a state Cabinet meeting.
The case is expected to be filed in federal court in New Jersey, where the company has its U.S. headquarters.
In a report to the state,
In a review of records at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the law firm said the Florida losses were “among the largest of any public fund investor.”
About $7.5 million of the Valeant transactions were on the Canadian stock exchange, which is not expected to be the focus of the lawsuit.
In an indication of how much Florida might recover from the litigation,
Both were class action lawsuits and
In releasing its third-quarter numbers on Tuesday, Joseph Papa, the chief executive officer of the embattled company, highlighted Valeant's “continued progress.”
“Valeant is a very different company today than it was a year ago. Under a new management team, we have strengthened our balance sheet and stabilized the company by simplifying our business and allocating resources more efficiently,” Papa said in a statement. “We realize there is more progress to be made, and we will continue to hold ourselves accountable for delivering on our commitments to best serve our shareholders, employees, customers, and most importantly, patients.”
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readGraffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250