Ticket-Fighting Startup Sues Florida Bar and Ticket Clinic for $11M
Tikd alleges the bar and the law firm are conspiring to drive the Coral Gables-based startup out of business.
November 08, 2017 at 06:10 PM
8 minute read
The ticket-fighting app Tikd and the Ticket Clinic law firm are back at each other's throats — and this time, the Florida Bar is involved.
Tikd on Wednesday sued the bar and the Ticket Clinic for $11.4 million in federal court, alleging the two organizations are conspiring to drive the Coral Gables-based startup out of business. The Tikd app allows drivers with minor traffic tickets to upload a picture of the ticket for a fee lower than the designated fine. The company, founded by nonlawyers, contracts with attorneys to argue against the tickets in court.
The Florida Bar has been investigating whether Tikd's business model involves the unlicensed practice of law, a representative confirmed earlier this year. Tikd alleges the “interminable” investigation has gone on for more than 10 months and is “scaring lawyers away” from the company.
Tikd alleges the Ticket Clinic has been making threatening calls to attorneys, saying they'll be disbarred if they work with the startup.
“Tikd carefully designed its services to comply with Florida law,” according to the lawsuit. “Tikd provides the technology and price guarantee; independent Florida lawyers provide the legal services. By combining technology, data analysis, and a network of independent lawyers, Tikd has created an innovative and better way to make legal services available to the general public. … Unfortunately, not everyone welcomes innovation and competition.”
A bar representative declined to comment on the litigation. The bar confirmed a recommendation to file for an injunction against Tikd was approved by both a Miami-Dade committee and a statewide committee on the unlicensed practice of law. The recommendation is under review.
Former Florida Bar president and Sedgwick partner Ray Abadin filed the complaint, which names current Bar President Michael Higer and other bar leaders as defendants. Abadin called the situation “not awkward at all.”
“I have 100 percent belief that my client is right: that this is not the unauthorized practice of law, that the bar rules are restrictive in nature and are, in a sense, anti-competitive in nature,” Abadin said. “We've tried to talk to the bar and they are not cooperating in any way in trying to resolve this in a normal fashion. So we live in America, and these get resolved in court.”
Abadin's co-counsel is Austin, Texas, attorney Peter Kennedy of Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody. Kennedy is pursuing a number of antitrust cases against state bars, including a case against the North Carolina State Bar that ended in a $10.5 million settlement with LegalZoom.
Ticket Clinic attorney Louis Arslanian of Hollywood declined to comment. He represented the 30-year-old ticket defense firm in two state court lawsuits between the Ticket Clinic and Tikd earlier this year.
In those cases, Tikd accused the Ticket Clinic of threatening its partner attorneys, and the law firm alleged Tikd was misleading consumers and violating bar rules. The companies settled the lawsuits in August, agreeing not to file any litigation with “the same subject matter” for eight months or until the bar investigation wrapped up, whichever came first.
Abadin said ”the two things are not related,” as the new case focuses on allegations of anti-competitive behavior.
“There was an understanding that everybody would wait for the bar process to continue, but certain actions of the bar and the Ticket Clinic warranted us filing this lawsuit in this forum at this time,” he said.
Last month, the Ticket Clinic filed a motion in Miami-Dade Circuit Court alleging Tikd breached the state court settlement agreement by using the firm's name as a “negative keyword” in Google AdWords advertisements.
The ticket-fighting app Tikd and the Ticket Clinic law firm are back at each other's throats — and this time, the Florida Bar is involved.
Tikd on Wednesday sued the bar and the Ticket Clinic for $11.4 million in federal court, alleging the two organizations are conspiring to drive the Coral Gables-based startup out of business. The Tikd app allows drivers with minor traffic tickets to upload a picture of the ticket for a fee lower than the designated fine. The company, founded by nonlawyers, contracts with attorneys to argue against the tickets in court.
The Florida Bar has been investigating whether Tikd's business model involves the unlicensed practice of law, a representative confirmed earlier this year. Tikd alleges the “interminable” investigation has gone on for more than 10 months and is “scaring lawyers away” from the company.
Tikd alleges the Ticket Clinic has been making threatening calls to attorneys, saying they'll be disbarred if they work with the startup.
“Tikd carefully designed its services to comply with Florida law,” according to the lawsuit. “Tikd provides the technology and price guarantee; independent Florida lawyers provide the legal services. By combining technology, data analysis, and a network of independent lawyers, Tikd has created an innovative and better way to make legal services available to the general public. … Unfortunately, not everyone welcomes innovation and competition.”
A bar representative declined to comment on the litigation. The bar confirmed a recommendation to file for an injunction against Tikd was approved by both a Miami-Dade committee and a statewide committee on the unlicensed practice of law. The recommendation is under review.
Former Florida Bar president and Sedgwick partner Ray Abadin filed the complaint, which names current Bar President Michael Higer and other bar leaders as defendants. Abadin called the situation “not awkward at all.”
“I have 100 percent belief that my client is right: that this is not the unauthorized practice of law, that the bar rules are restrictive in nature and are, in a sense, anti-competitive in nature,” Abadin said. “We've tried to talk to the bar and they are not cooperating in any way in trying to resolve this in a normal fashion. So we live in America, and these get resolved in court.”
Abadin's co-counsel is Austin, Texas, attorney Peter Kennedy of
Ticket Clinic attorney Louis Arslanian of Hollywood declined to comment. He represented the 30-year-old ticket defense firm in two state court lawsuits between the Ticket Clinic and Tikd earlier this year.
In those cases, Tikd accused the Ticket Clinic of threatening its partner attorneys, and the law firm alleged Tikd was misleading consumers and violating bar rules. The companies settled the lawsuits in August, agreeing not to file any litigation with “the same subject matter” for eight months or until the bar investigation wrapped up, whichever came first.
Abadin said ”the two things are not related,” as the new case focuses on allegations of anti-competitive behavior.
“There was an understanding that everybody would wait for the bar process to continue, but certain actions of the bar and the Ticket Clinic warranted us filing this lawsuit in this forum at this time,” he said.
Last month, the Ticket Clinic filed a motion in Miami-Dade Circuit Court alleging Tikd breached the state court settlement agreement by using the firm's name as a “negative keyword” in
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250