Fowler Rodriguez Attorney Handles Transaction, Trial for Seller of North Miami-Dade County Tract
Michael Rosen represented the property seller in a court as well, and won.
November 14, 2017 at 10:54 AM
8 minute read
Attorney Michael Rosen's work for the seller of a 181-acre site in North Miami-Dade County involved more than handling the transaction. He also handled — and won — a trial for his client.
The Mazel Group LLC, a Brooklyn developer, sold the tract in North Miami-Dade County for $40 million to San Simeon Lennar LLC, an affiliate of Miami-based homebuilder Lennar Corp.
Rosen, a partner at Fowler Rodriguez in Coral Gables, represented The Mazel Group in the deal that closed Oct. 3.
The property is at 20898 San Simeon Way, in an unincorporated area that's just south of the north county line. It used to be a golf course and now it's vacant, despite at least two previous property owners' plans for a development.
Most recently, The Mazel Group had planned for a residential project.
It bought the property for $19.1 million in 2014, according to the Miami-Dade County property appraiser's office.
Then, in May 2015, an adjacent residential community's homeowners association, Lakeview of the California Club Homeowners Association Inc., sued The Mazel Group over having construction vehicles use a road belonging to Lakeview to enter The Mazel Group's property, court records show.
When the property was a golf course, golf carts and cars used Lakeview's road, and the homeowners association raised no issue, and, in fact, it informally allowed it, according to the complaint.
But the association raised issue with the construction vehicles, citing endangerment to residents, at one point barricading the road, according to the complaint. It asked the court to stop Mazel's construction vehicles from using Lakeview's road, according to the complaint.
“We wound up having a trial during the middle of this sale procedure,” said Rosen, who represented The Mazel Group in the lawsuit. “The Mazel Group counterclaimed it had the right to use” the road.
A trial was held in May and the legal fight concluded in June when the court issued a final judgment in favor of The Mazel Group. The court said the developer has the right to use the road and prohibited the homeowners association from blocking it, court records show.
It wasn't necessary for the lawsuit to end, and for it to end in favor of Mazel, for the sale to Lennar to close, Rosen said. Still, he added, it was better that it had this outcome.
“As a practical matter, it was helpful to get a conclusion because it was still within the time frame of Lennar's due diligence. If Lennar was not happy with the result obtained from the litigation, they could have canceled the deal on that basis,” Rosen said. ”It was good the litigation was terminated and terminated in favor of Mazel … because Lennar now gets the benefit of that decision as well.”
Aside from the lawsuit, there were other hurdles to closing the sale.
Lennar asked for several extensions of the due diligence period, according to Rosen.
Then, there was Hurricane Irma, which hit Florida on Sept. 10, and, in its aftermath, multiple transactions were delayed as power outages and closed airports delayed inspections.
Working with the county “was a long procedure that was extended even more so when Hurricane Irma hit, Rosen said, noting that the county had other priorities from the storm.
Prior to selling, The Mazel Group had installed water and sewer pipes, cleared some of the land and built a wall along part of the property's boundary, Rosen said.
But then it decided to sell to Lennar instead of continue with its plan for residences.
“They got a very good and fair offer from Lennar and just made the decision that rather than continue with the long and arduous procedure to build a residential community of that size, they decided to sell,” Rosen said.
It's expected that, given that Lennar is a residential developer, residences will be built on the property, he added.
Lennar declined to comment on its plan for the property.
Attorney Michael Rosen's work for the seller of a 181-acre site in North Miami-Dade County involved more than handling the transaction. He also handled — and won — a trial for his client.
The Mazel Group LLC, a Brooklyn developer, sold the tract in North Miami-Dade County for $40 million to San Simeon Lennar LLC, an affiliate of Miami-based homebuilder Lennar Corp.
Rosen, a partner at
The property is at 20898 San Simeon Way, in an unincorporated area that's just south of the north county line. It used to be a golf course and now it's vacant, despite at least two previous property owners' plans for a development.
Most recently, The Mazel Group had planned for a residential project.
It bought the property for $19.1 million in 2014, according to the Miami-Dade County property appraiser's office.
Then, in May 2015, an adjacent residential community's homeowners association, Lakeview of the California Club Homeowners Association Inc., sued The Mazel Group over having construction vehicles use a road belonging to Lakeview to enter The Mazel Group's property, court records show.
When the property was a golf course, golf carts and cars used Lakeview's road, and the homeowners association raised no issue, and, in fact, it informally allowed it, according to the complaint.
But the association raised issue with the construction vehicles, citing endangerment to residents, at one point barricading the road, according to the complaint. It asked the court to stop Mazel's construction vehicles from using Lakeview's road, according to the complaint.
“We wound up having a trial during the middle of this sale procedure,” said Rosen, who represented The Mazel Group in the lawsuit. “The Mazel Group counterclaimed it had the right to use” the road.
A trial was held in May and the legal fight concluded in June when the court issued a final judgment in favor of The Mazel Group. The court said the developer has the right to use the road and prohibited the homeowners association from blocking it, court records show.
It wasn't necessary for the lawsuit to end, and for it to end in favor of Mazel, for the sale to Lennar to close, Rosen said. Still, he added, it was better that it had this outcome.
“As a practical matter, it was helpful to get a conclusion because it was still within the time frame of Lennar's due diligence. If Lennar was not happy with the result obtained from the litigation, they could have canceled the deal on that basis,” Rosen said. ”It was good the litigation was terminated and terminated in favor of Mazel … because Lennar now gets the benefit of that decision as well.”
Aside from the lawsuit, there were other hurdles to closing the sale.
Lennar asked for several extensions of the due diligence period, according to Rosen.
Then, there was Hurricane Irma, which hit Florida on Sept. 10, and, in its aftermath, multiple transactions were delayed as power outages and closed airports delayed inspections.
Working with the county “was a long procedure that was extended even more so when Hurricane Irma hit, Rosen said, noting that the county had other priorities from the storm.
Prior to selling, The Mazel Group had installed water and sewer pipes, cleared some of the land and built a wall along part of the property's boundary, Rosen said.
But then it decided to sell to Lennar instead of continue with its plan for residences.
“They got a very good and fair offer from Lennar and just made the decision that rather than continue with the long and arduous procedure to build a residential community of that size, they decided to sell,” Rosen said.
It's expected that, given that Lennar is a residential developer, residences will be built on the property, he added.
Lennar declined to comment on its plan for the property.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYacht Broker Says It 'Has Done Nothing Wrong.' Asks Miami Court to Dismiss the Case
Hyper-Reality Revisited: A Tour of Waldorf Astoria Hotel & Residences Miami
5 minute read10 Years Later, This High Court Fight Over Real Estate Commissions Is Far From Over
4 minute readBroward Judge Awards $9.9M in Attorney Fees and Costs After $33M Salmon Settlement
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250