Holland & Knight Defeats Conspiracy Case Against Nicklaus Children's Hospital
A federal judge tossed a lawsuit alleging the hospital improperly worked to absorb an independent physician practice group.
November 14, 2017 at 02:17 PM
2 minute read
Holland & Knight attorneys won the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging Miami's Nicklaus Children's Hospital tried to illegally “build a hospital empire” by ”proceeding over the rubble of independent physician practice groups.”
U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro issued a summary judgment order Monday tossing the case, which was filed by pediatric kidney specialists alleging the hospital improperly attempted to absorb their practice group by conspiring with one of the group's doctors.
The decision is a victory for attorneys in Holland & Knight's Jacksonville and Tallahassee offices: partners Jerome Hoffman, Donny MacKenzie, Kevin Cox and Mia McKown and associates Laura Renstrom, Tiffany Roddenberry and Michael Gropper.
The complaint alleged the hospital worked with Dr. Felix Ramirez-Seijas to eliminate the Pediatric Nephrology Associates of South Florida partnership, which practiced at the hospital, because its two other doctors refused to join the in-house physician practice group.
Dr. Anselmo Cepero and Dr. Ana Paredes alleged the defendants carried out the conspiracy by evicting them from their offices at the hospital, terminating teaching agreements and posting a misleading job ad that counted the partnership's patients as the hospital's.
The judge focused on the false-advertising allegation brought under the Lanham Act, as it was the only federal law claim in the case, and she declined to exercise jurisdiction over the state law claims. Ungaro ruled the plaintiffs did not meet Lanham Act requirements by failing to prove the job ad deceived or could deceive consumers, and that the alleged deception affected purchasing decisions.
“What little relevant evidence there is shows that no patient would have seen the job post,” Ungaro wrote. “Dr. Paredes testified that patients would not have seen the post. Additionally, PNASF could not identify any potential referral source that was misled by the post.”
The partnership also could not identify any referral sources who stopped sending them patients because of the job ad, the judge ruled.
“We view the order as neutral on the merits of the case,” said plaintiffs attorney Kevin Kaplan of Coffey Burlington in Miami. “The gist of the order is that the doctors must prove their case in state court as opposed to federal court, and we look forward to that.”
Antitrust allegations were withdrawn earlier in the lawsuit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250