How Small Can You Go? Miami Eyes Micro-Units at 275 Square Feet
The smallest residence now allowed in the city is 400 square feet.
November 17, 2017 at 03:10 PM
9 minute read
Miamians looking for affordable apartments soon might have a new option — living in a home that's slightly larger than the average parking space.
The city is on a path to change its regulations to permit 275-square-foot apartments, a decrease from the smallest currently allowed square footage of 400, in parts of Miami.
The City Commission on Thursday tentatively approved the measure, which is set for a final vote Dec. 14.
“We don't want to continue urban sprawl, and we want to provide solutions that create affordability,” said City Commissioner Ken Russell, a co-sponsor of the plan. “By limiting how small a unit can be, we are really tying the hands of what development is possible and what development is available for people who want to live in the city.”
Miami already is home to smaller homes. At Wynwood 25, which is under construction, the average apartment will be 750 square feet.
The city would impose new rules for the tiniest apartments. Each unit must have a full bathroom and kitchen, and micro-unit buildings cannot abut low-density residential areas, according to the city planning department.
Developers would be allowed to build micro-units only in areas with transit-oriented development areas, which is considered within a half mile of Metrorail and Metromover stations. As a concession to developers, no minimum parking requirement would be set, and a maximum of one spot for unit would be imposed.
“The conceits of a micro-unit is that you are taking on a smaller living space, but you are sort of exchanging you own personal living space for the city as a whole, the livability of Miami. Your living room becomes the streets of Brickell, downtown,” said Joe Eisenberg, a city planner.
The requirement to build close to mass transit stops and the lack of mandated parking go hand-in-hand.
“Limiting them to TOD (transit-oriented development) areas ensures that somebody who lives in these areas doesn't have to own a car,” Eisenberg said. Residents “are expanding their range. They can now get to South Miami and Miami Beach. They can get to major job centers. It really expands their range in that way.”
And requiring a parking maximum but no minimum would help make micro-units more affordable, he added. Parking requirements tend to push up the cost of development and in turn rents.
This measure is another push to make Miami more of an urban environment, said Anthony De Yurre, an attorney with the Bilzin Sumberg land use and zoning practice in Miami.
“This is one of the urban planning tools they use across the country to promote the urban planning trifecta: More affordability, proximity to transportation and attracting new talent,” De Yurre said. “In affordability, we rank poorly. We rank poorly in terms of public transportation ridership and, as a result, we struggle to maintain our young talent here and they go elsewhere.”
PATH TO AFFORDABILITY
The smallest units would leave more money in the hands of tenants but allow developers to charge relatively more per square foot, Eisenberg said.
The rent per square foot in Miami now averages about $3 per square foot, according to Eisenberg. That translates to $1,200 a month for a 400-square-foot unit. If the rent for a 275-square-foot unit is increased to $4 per square foot, the renter would pay $1,100 or less.
But Russell said micro-units are no silver bullet for affordable housing — and warned they could push up rents in a neighborhood.
“If you are in a very high-end area like Brickell and someone decides to take advantage of the new reduced-size limit, they'll probably dress those units to the nines. They'll outfit them with the highest amenities and try to get the highest square-foot price, which could actually drive the overall square foot price of everything in that area,” he said.
City staff is looking at how it could weave into the measure incentives for developers to keep units affordable, Russell said.
Miamians looking for affordable apartments soon might have a new option — living in a home that's slightly larger than the average parking space.
The city is on a path to change its regulations to permit 275-square-foot apartments, a decrease from the smallest currently allowed square footage of 400, in parts of Miami.
The City Commission on Thursday tentatively approved the measure, which is set for a final vote Dec. 14.
“We don't want to continue urban sprawl, and we want to provide solutions that create affordability,” said City Commissioner Ken Russell, a co-sponsor of the plan. “By limiting how small a unit can be, we are really tying the hands of what development is possible and what development is available for people who want to live in the city.”
Miami already is home to smaller homes. At Wynwood 25, which is under construction, the average apartment will be 750 square feet.
The city would impose new rules for the tiniest apartments. Each unit must have a full bathroom and kitchen, and micro-unit buildings cannot abut low-density residential areas, according to the city planning department.
Developers would be allowed to build micro-units only in areas with transit-oriented development areas, which is considered within a half mile of Metrorail and Metromover stations. As a concession to developers, no minimum parking requirement would be set, and a maximum of one spot for unit would be imposed.
“The conceits of a micro-unit is that you are taking on a smaller living space, but you are sort of exchanging you own personal living space for the city as a whole, the livability of Miami. Your living room becomes the streets of Brickell, downtown,” said Joe Eisenberg, a city planner.
The requirement to build close to mass transit stops and the lack of mandated parking go hand-in-hand.
“Limiting them to TOD (transit-oriented development) areas ensures that somebody who lives in these areas doesn't have to own a car,” Eisenberg said. Residents “are expanding their range. They can now get to South Miami and Miami Beach. They can get to major job centers. It really expands their range in that way.”
And requiring a parking maximum but no minimum would help make micro-units more affordable, he added. Parking requirements tend to push up the cost of development and in turn rents.
This measure is another push to make Miami more of an urban environment, said Anthony De Yurre, an attorney with the
“This is one of the urban planning tools they use across the country to promote the urban planning trifecta: More affordability, proximity to transportation and attracting new talent,” De Yurre said. “In affordability, we rank poorly. We rank poorly in terms of public transportation ridership and, as a result, we struggle to maintain our young talent here and they go elsewhere.”
PATH TO AFFORDABILITY
The smallest units would leave more money in the hands of tenants but allow developers to charge relatively more per square foot, Eisenberg said.
The rent per square foot in Miami now averages about $3 per square foot, according to Eisenberg. That translates to $1,200 a month for a 400-square-foot unit. If the rent for a 275-square-foot unit is increased to $4 per square foot, the renter would pay $1,100 or less.
But Russell said micro-units are no silver bullet for affordable housing — and warned they could push up rents in a neighborhood.
“If you are in a very high-end area like Brickell and someone decides to take advantage of the new reduced-size limit, they'll probably dress those units to the nines. They'll outfit them with the highest amenities and try to get the highest square-foot price, which could actually drive the overall square foot price of everything in that area,” he said.
City staff is looking at how it could weave into the measure incentives for developers to keep units affordable, Russell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 2Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 3How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 4Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
- 5Decision of the Day: Judge Explains Ruling to Partially Sequester, Grant Anonymity to Jurors in MS-13 Murder Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250