Creditors' Rights: How to Deal With Debt and Today's Hottest Rap Stars
Bling and drama are two words that come to mind when one thinks of today's rap stars. However, a third more common word seems to permeate this genre of musicians and performers–that is debt. Whether it is due to a feeling of entitlement, a result of being surrounded by inept handlers or just plain old theft can be debated, but the fact remains that the failure of many of such performers to pay their bills is epidemic.
November 21, 2017 at 10:19 AM
5 minute read
Bling and drama are two words that come to mind when one thinks of today's rap stars. However, a third more common word seems to permeate this genre of musicians and performers–that is debt. Whether it is due to a feeling of entitlement, a result of being surrounded by inept handlers or just plain old theft can be debated, but the fact remains that the failure of many of such performers to pay their bills is epidemic. The artists include some of the biggest names in entertainment today.
In order to avoid becoming the victim, the burden is on the creditor to know who he or she is dealing with. Many of these artists just don't pay those rightfully entitled to payment. It is easy for them to do so because for every creditor there are dozens of other vendors, prospective employees and service providers who so desperately want to be part of the scene, they are oblivious to the fact that they will fall victim to the fame and supposed fortune of these individuals.
Clearly, part of the problem stems from the fact that such artists do not make as much money as musicians and performers made years ago when record companies would throw boat loads of cash at the successful ones. The problem is further compounded by the fact that there are too many hands partaking in an ever-diminishing pot. By the time the artist's agents, managers, attorneys, co-writers and others get their cut, not much is left for the artist. Moreover, the artists themselves are part of a society where they are expected to exude wealth and project the image that they have arrived. To do so, they must be clothed in expensive and pretentious jewelry, live in expensive homes and drive expensive cars. All that takes money, which is in shorter supply than before.
Additionally, many of these artists came from humble backgrounds and have no appreciation for the money they are now earning. Others have had criminal backgrounds and even after they have left such lives behind, they still cannot detach themselves from the mindset of their past.
So how does a creditor of today's rap stars address this newfound reality? First, it is critical that a written instrument be procured and signed by the star or by someone with a power of attorney. Accepting the signature of anyone else leaves the door open to a defense that that person had no actual or apparent authority to bind the start. Second, and most obvious, is getting money up front. In reality, that might be the only payment the creditor ever sees. If the creditor is selling something to the star, a security interest would certainly be helpful. However, because there are too many other vendors who might be willing to do business without it, most likely one will not be obtainable. But more importantly, it is imperative that a prospective creditor gain an appreciation for the star's background and those who are his or her handlers. There are numerous databases where backgrounds can be checked and the internet is a treasure trove of information as well. Court databases in the cities where these stars live and work are also replete with information as to lawsuits they have been involved in and many states have judgment lien registries to determine where you will stand in line if you are forced to initiate legal proceedings. If payments are not being processed by a star's handlers, a creditor should attempt to try to reach the star directly. Frequently, celebrities don't have a handle on their financial affairs.
If you are forced to litigate, you may be in litigation for the long haul. Since the artists are always on the road and difficult to pin down, it is oftentimes difficult to serve them with process and then when that is accomplished, it is even more difficult to schedule their depositions and conduct discovery. Many of the stars who are intentionally not paying will direct their attorneys to put up every roadblock and use every delay tactic available in an effort to avoid payment including dilatory and meritless counterclaims. Another layer of difficulty a creditor must dig through are musician's use of shell corporations for their management and production. The use of such entities requires that they be brought in as parties. Consequently, if a judgment is secured against them, additional effort is required to try to pierce the entity to get to its officers or managers individually or alternatively to find its assets.
Moreover, due to the publicity many of these cases get, the rap stars feel that they need to protect their image and be looked favorably upon in the court of public opinion. First, you have to deal with what are some pretty large egos. Second, you have to deal with a mindset where total exoneration is the only outcome the rap star will find acceptable, even if it is one that will never be achieved. At the end of the day, we all assume that justice will prevail and when it does, there will be plenty of bling to pursue to satisfy the judgment obtained.
Andrew Dector, a shareholder with Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, of Boca Raton, has represented clients in commercial litigation in both state and federal courts and in arbitration and mediation for more than three decades. Contact him at 561-477-7800 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250