Diversity's Paradigm Shift Makes for Better Law Firms
Diversity encourages creative and novel strategies, and it should be adopted by law firms to improve their results, writes attorney Amanda McGovern.
November 22, 2017 at 01:11 PM
3 minute read
Forget Brown v. Board of Education. Inclusion isn't a favor to the socially diverse (i.e., women, African-Americans, Latinos, LGBTQ). Diversity is essential to winning. Corporate clients know this already, and they want to win.
There is a significant edge to a law firm that not only attracts but successfully promotes and retains ethnically and gender-diverse lawyers.
Katherine W. Phillips, senior vice dean and the Paul Calello Professor of Leadership and Ethics at Columbia Business School, explained the bottom line: “The fact is that if you want to build teams or organizations capable of innovating, you need diversity. Diversity enhances creativity. It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives, leading to better decision making and problem solving. Diversity can improve the bottom line of companies and lead to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations. Even simply being exposed to diversity can change the way you think. This is not just wishful thinking: it is the conclusion I draw from decades of research from organizational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers.”
If the upside of diversity is all that, how do we explain the barren numbers of African-American, women, Latino, LGBTQ partners in the legal profession? Diversity isn't always easy, and it can create friction.
Phillips' research reveals that diversity in a group can create discomfort emanating from issues of trust, lack of communication and feelings of disrespect. But that friction yields strength and power; swords are forged by hammer, fire and persistence.
People who come from the same paradigm expect to be understood in terms of their own life experiences, and therefore often share the same perspective on an issue, and reach agreement on that issue based on their experiences and perspectives. What's wrong with that?
What's wrong with that is the failure to entertain other perspectives and beliefs. A homogenous group tends to engineer a single, predictable solution.
Successful results, though, often require creative and novel strategies — ideas. Phillips' research demonstrates that members of socially diverse groups “change their expectations.” They work harder to reach an agreement, and that process leads to more developed, fully fleshed-out outcomes.
Over the last 25 years of practice, the one sentence that always made me and my partners smile was this: “I've got a different idea.”
Successful results in the practice of law depend on the same kind of innovative minds that find solutions in the practice of science. Strength through diversity is fact; strength through travel bans and other anti-diversity actions is fiction.
The cost of homogeneity is immeasurable and unknowable — the hidden cost of the missed idea, the missed solution, from looking only at what you know and not seeking to know what you do not. Ignorance is not bliss when you want to be successful and effective.
Be selfish. Don't be diverse to be politically correct. Don't be diverse out of the goodness of your heart. Be diverse to become a better law firm. Be diverse to win. Be diverse to stay relevant. Be diverse because it is the essence of the enlightened practice of law. Be diverse because the cost of not being diverse is the lost bid, the lost idea itself. Be diverse because it is, in fact, the ultimate bottom line.
Amanda McGovern is a litigation partner at Rivero Mestre in Coral Gables and a 2017 fellow on the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity. She handles commercial litigation, including international arbitration and litigation. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250