Shipping and Trucking Company Signs Big Hialeah Gardens Industrial Lease
Pro Intermodal is leasing more than 100,000 square feet from Duke Realty in Hialeah Gardens.
November 27, 2017 at 02:40 PM
2 minute read
Cushman & Wakefield executive director Wayne Ramoski (pictured left) and director Gian Rodriguez (pictured right) represented the property owner, Duke Realty, in the lease negotiations.
A Miami-Dade County-based freight shipping and trucking company has leased more than 15 percent of the space at a sprawling Hialeah Gardens industrial complex.
Pro Intermodal leased 104,616 square feet at the Miami Industrial Logistics Center. The lease value and duration were not disclosed.
Cushman & Wakefield executive director Wayne Ramoski and director Gian Rodriguez represented property owner Duke Realty in the negotiations for the long-term lease.
The Miami Industrial Logistics Center has three buildings. Miami Industrial Logistics Center I at 15002 NW 107th Ave. is 209,232 square feet. The 211,757-square-foot Miami Industrial Logistics Center II is at 14802 NW 107th Ave. adjacent to the first building. And the 255,846-square-foot Miami Industrial Logistics Center III is at 10701 NW 140th St. south of the other two buildings.
Pro Intermodal leased half of the Miami Industrial Logistics Center I. Building features include a 180-foot fenced truck court shared with its neighbor, 32-foot clear heights, a 60-foot staging bay and LED lighting.
Pro Intermodal's space also has 2,500 square feet of spec office space—something that helped facilitate the transaction, according to Cushman & Wakefield.
“We were able to make this deal happen so quickly because of the previously constructed spec office and Duke's ability to deliver the space within Pro Intermodal's truncated timetable,” Rodriguez said in an emailed media release.
Rodriguez and Ramoski previously secured a different lease on behalf of Duke Realty at the industrial complex.
Duke Realty acquired the buildings in April from Bridge Development Partners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Yacht Broker Says It 'Has Done Nothing Wrong.' Asks Miami Court to Dismiss the Case
Hyper-Reality Revisited: A Tour of Waldorf Astoria Hotel & Residences Miami
5 minute read
10 Years Later, This High Court Fight Over Real Estate Commissions Is Far From Over
4 minute read
Broward Judge Awards $9.9M in Attorney Fees and Costs After $33M Salmon Settlement
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
