Constitution Revision Proposal Could Require E-Verify in Florida
A panel of the Florida Constitution Revision Commission unanimously backed a proposal that would require all employers in Florida to use the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Employment Authorization Program to determine the eligibility of new employees.
November 29, 2017 at 02:04 PM
4 minute read
Florida businesses would have to verify through the federal government that newly hired employees aren't undocumented immigrants under a measure that moved closer to appearing before voters in 2018 despite opposition from agriculture interests.
A panel of the Florida Constitution Revision Commission unanimously backed a proposal (P 29) that would require all employers in Florida to use the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Employment Authorization Program, known as E-Verify, to determine the eligibility of new employees.
Commissioner Rich Newsome, an attorney from Orlando who sponsored the proposal, said the measure has widespread support from the public. However, he said the issue has failed to garner legislative support in past years because powerful special interests tied to agriculture and construction make it “impossible” to advance.
“Everybody knows why it can't pass the Legislature despite the fact that if you polled the Republican base of the folks that are in power, it's off the chart,” Newsome said.
Adam Blalock, representing the Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association, told the commission's General Provisions Committee that if E-Verify is put in place, the agriculture industry would suffer a short-term labor shortage that would result in lost and unharvested crops.
“There must be a replacement labor for agriculture before E-Verify is established,” Blalock said.
“The federal government this year is working on legislation to better the H-2A guest worker program to try to remove some of the problems that agriculture faces to allow a more legal workforce to be in the United States,” Blalock continued. “But domestic supply of agriculture workers, it's not there to replace those who would inevitably be not able to work if E-Verify was put into place. There is just not that population of people that is willing to do the hard work to get the food on your table. And that's not a popular opinion, but it is reality.”
Newsome said he offered a carve-out for agriculture interests that use guest-worker visas, but a number of midsized farmers are concerned about covering housing, transportation and health care costs.
“The big guys are OK with it, but the little guys don't want to pay for the housing,” Newsome said, recounting the message he got from one grower.
E-Verify has been an issue in Florida for more than a decade, drawing heightened attention as jobs grew scarce during the recession that started in 2007.
Seeking to crack down on the use of undocumented workers, Gov. Rick Scott pushed as part of his 2010 campaign platform the need to require all businesses in Florida to use E-Verify.
After pushback from business groups supporting the agricultural industry, Scott eventually signed an executive order shortly after taking office in 2011 that required state agencies under the direction of the governor's office to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees by using E-Verify.
Christopher Emmanuel, Florida Chamber of Commerce director of infrastructure and governance policy, told the committee Tuesday the issue should be left to the Legislature and that his organization has a problem with putting federal programs into the state constitution.
“I could only find one federal program that's mentioned in our foundational document and that's Medicaid, [and] that's a pretty significant portion of our state's budget,” Emmanuel said.
Required in at least 20 states, E-Verify is an internet-based system for employers to check the eligibility of employees to work in the U.S. The system is used by more than 700,000 employers.
If Newsome's proposal is put on the November 2018 ballot and approved by 60 percent of voters, the state Department of Business and Professional Regulation would have to oversee the use of the federal program by any employer seeking a license to operate in Florida starting July 1, 2020.
Intentionally failing to use the program after that date would result in an automatic suspension of all licenses until compliance is met and fines of up to $1,000 per investigation are paid.
An employer found hiring at least five or more “unauthorized aliens” would have all licenses suspended for seven to 30 days. The fines would grow on subsequent violations.
The 37-member Constitution Revision Commission, which meets every 20 years, has the power to directly place proposed constitutional amendments on the 2018 general-election ballot.
The E-Verify proposal is one of dozens being considered by the commission. The E-Verify proposal must get approval from the Executive Committee before it reaches the entire commission.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1John Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
- 2Why Associates in This Growing Legal Market Are Leaving Their Firms
- 3Visa's Defense of DOJ Antitrust Case Suffers Setback After Court Denies Motion to Dismiss
- 4Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
- 5Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250