Regular Audits Are a Must for Joint-Venture Real Estate Projects
As Miami's real estate market shows signs of cooling, developers of joint-venture projects already underway may look for ways to speed up delivery and save dollars.
November 30, 2017 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
As Miami's real estate market shows signs of cooling, developers of joint-venture projects already underway may look for ways to speed up delivery and save dollars. While eschewing regular audits may seem like a logical step, not performing them could threaten not only the success of a venture but also the future of all those involved in it. If errors are left uncorrected or required actions remain undone, the development team runs the risk of lost opportunities as well as potential issues with lenders and investors—the lifeblood of a development.
Basically, an audit is a critical evaluation of the recorded financial information in a venture. Conducting regular audits promotes transparency. It allows the principals to determine whether any modifications to a project's accounting and reporting procedures are needed. It can save a project's developers, lenders and investors from ugly surprises and embarrassment down the road. It gives all parties involved the comfort of knowing that the assimilation and reporting of vital financials is off to a good start—and with reliable oversight and reporting, they can continue to identify errors and potential problems on a timely basis.
So why do some developers resist regular audits at critical points in the development of their projects?
Many feel that audits that are not actually required by law are a waste of time and money. To quote an old saying, that's being penny wise and pound foolish. It's true that if auditors find the books are in order and no adjustments are required, their work may seem like an unnecessary expense. But in today's fast-pasted real-estate development environment, it's easy for a mistake to go unnoticed. Regular audits ensure that, months or years, later little oversights don't surface as major issues incurring significant penalties. It's always better to be sure that any errors or irregularities are rooted out before they have a chance to spread.
Nobody likes to invite criticism. It's not pleasant for finance and accounting teams to have auditors pore over their work in search of mistakes. But that discomfort will be more than offset by the opportunity to make any necessary corrections in a timely manner or by the auditors' opinion that their financial statements are in order.
The advantages of regular audits far outweigh these objections. For example, an audit of a venture in its early stages can allow time for oversights to be corrected or an election made before reporting and election deadlines have passed.
A good audit not only covers the basics such as a joint venture's cash flows, debt and equity structures, budgeting, tax-planning opportunities and the like. It also brings to light any accounting disagreements or potential weaknesses in internal controls. And it encourages a better understanding of a venture at both the project level and the organizational level.
In fact, an audit that includes an evaluation of a venture's organizational structure is crucial in Miami's multicultural market, since an improper or inefficient tax structure may have profound consequences for foreign investors. Auditors can work with all parties to ensure that all necessary steps are taken to avoid unnecessary penalties and taxes. They can protect the financial health of a joint venture.
Audited financial statements are often required by traditional lenders and other funding sources. Such statements testify to the credibility of a joint venture.
In addition, audited financial statements used in conjunction with waterfall or other distribution criteria eliminate the need for claw-backs due to reporting or distribution errors, which are not only embarrassing but can inflict serious damage to the reputation, credibility and livelihood of a project's principals.
The financial discipline an audit regime provides gives important assurance to a developer as well as the project's lenders and investors that the financial affairs of the venture are being handled correctly and transparently. This is critical to maintaining a continued flow of financing and capital investment in current and future projects in a tax-efficient, financially responsible manner.
The bottom line is when under taking a joint-venture project, developers need to be sure to conduct audits regularly.
Steve Klein is managing corporate and real estate partner at Gerson Preston accounting firm in Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Chief Business Development and Marketing Officer From EY
2 minute readMcDermott Welcomes Back Litigation Partner Following Stint With Miami-Dade County
3 minute readFlorida Bar Rolls Out Free Trust Accounting Software for All Its Members
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250