Why Aren't Florida Law Firms Attracting More Millennials?
Less than one-third of the lawyers at large and midsize firms in cities across the state are millennials.
November 30, 2017 at 04:01 PM
4 minute read
This story is part of a series exploring how law firms and others in the legal industry are adapting to manage their millennial workers, from recruitment and real estate to training and technology and beyond. Read our overview here.
Millennials make up about only 31 percent of the lawyers at most of the biggest firms in seven of Florida's largest cities—a smaller number than the national average of 43 percent.
According to date collected by ALM Intelligence, millennials are now the largest generational group of lawyers at large and midsize firms across the United States. At the national level, millennials (ages 18 to 36) outnumber the 33 percent of lawyers from Generation X (ages 37 to 52) at firms in the Am Law 200 and The National Law Journal's NLJ 500. They also outnumber the 22 percent of baby boomers, the data shows.
In Florida, however, millennials make up a smaller percentage—in part because some of the nation's larger firms have smaller outposts in the state. The largest firms tend to employ the greatest percentage of associates, and therefore millennials. Also, the data does not include Holland & Knight, one of the largest firms in the state.
Of the seven Florida cities included in the research, large to midsize firms in Miami employed the largest number of millennial lawyers—781—or 35 percent of the total number of lawyers at those firms. Their offices in Pensacola, which had a considerably smaller overall headcount, actually employed a larger percentage of millennials—36 percent. In Orlando, 29 percent of the lawyers in firms of that size are millennials.
At the large firms in Jacksonville, 34 percent of lawyers are millennials, while in Tampa, millennials make up 33 percent of the lawyers. In Naples, the proportion of millennials at larger firms is 28 percent.
The Role of the Legal Sector
Bridget Maguire, founder and CEO of Premier Legal Advantage, a legal recruiting firm that services the Am Law 200, said the difference in the proportion of millennials from one region of the country to another is driven at least in part by a region's predominant legal sector.
For instance, the smallest percentage of millennial lawyers in Florida—23 percent—is at firms in Tallahassee, the state capital. This is attributable at least in part to the fact that a considerable amount of government relations work is done there—a practice area for which firms tend to hire laterals with more experience or who have established contacts.
Another factor, according to Maguire, is that Florida is not a major deal center. Although an increasing number of big deals have been coming to South Florida, the kind of major deals where young lawyers gain experience, confidence, training, clients and direction are largely done in New York.
“The major money center cities are still the draw for people to develop their careers because there is a greater volume of work in New York that can subsidize the growth and development of a young attorney's practice,” Maguire said.
And then there is just size. The largest firms in terms of numbers of lawyers or profits per partner tend to have larger offices in key U.S. cities such as New York, Washington and Chicago. Those also tend to be the firms that have the highest proportion of millennials.
“While it's growing, the Miami legal market has a tendency to have offices that are on the smaller side when you compare them to offices in New York, Chicago and Washington,” Maguire said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250