Simply Healthcare Plans Required to Return $1.8M to State
It is the first time that a managed-care plan participating in Florida's statewide Medicaid managed-care program had to return money to the state, according the Agency for Health Care Administration.
December 04, 2017 at 02:38 PM
5 minute read
Simply Healthcare Plans made too much money from Florida's health care program that treats the poor, elderly and disabled and was required to return nearly $1.8 million to the state.
It is the first time that a managed-care plan participating in Florida's statewide Medicaid managed-care program had to return money to the state, according to testimony provided to the Florida Legislature early this year by Beth Kidder, a deputy secretary at the Agency for Health Care Administration.
Simply Healthcare spokesman James Freeman told The News Service of Florida on Friday that the managed-care plan had already made the payment to the state. Agency for Health Care Administration spokeswoman Mallory McManus said the agency hadn't received the payment but was expecting it early this week.
The Legislature in 2011 passed a law that requires most Medicaid patients — from the cradle to the grave — to enroll in HMOs or other managed-care plans. The state pays monthly premiums to managed-care plans to provide care to patients, and the plans are required to provide access to all covered services, regardless of whether the cost of those services exceeds the paid premiums.
To ensure that the plans don't make too much of a windfall, the Legislature included in the law a so-called achieved savings rebate, which is established by determining pretax income as a percentage of revenues.
Under the achieved savings rebate, plans are required to return money to the state if their pretax incomes exceed certain thresholds. Simply Healthcare had to return the money based on the amount of money it brought in.
When asked whether the company's excessive income hurt patients, Freeman replied, “Simply Healthcare is committed to providing access to quality, affordable services and we continually support efforts that are in the best interest of the health and well-being of our members and the entire community. “
Simply Healthcare has participated in the statewide Medicaid managed-care program since the program's inception. The state is in the process of contracting again with managed-care plans. Simply Healthcare is one of 10 plans that have indicated interest in providing Medicaid services statewide.
The Agency for Health Care Administration notified Simply Healthcare on Nov. 2 that it needed to return the $1.8 million, according to agency spokeswoman Shelisha Coleman.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
Simply Healthcare Plans made too much money from Florida's health care program that treats the poor, elderly and disabled and was required to return nearly $1.8 million to the state.
It is the first time that a managed-care plan participating in Florida's statewide Medicaid managed-care program had to return money to the state, according to testimony provided to the Florida Legislature early this year by Beth Kidder, a deputy secretary at the Agency for Health Care Administration.
Simply Healthcare spokesman James Freeman told The News Service of Florida on Friday that the managed-care plan had already made the payment to the state. Agency for Health Care Administration spokeswoman Mallory McManus said the agency hadn't received the payment but was expecting it early this week.
The Legislature in 2011 passed a law that requires most Medicaid patients — from the cradle to the grave — to enroll in HMOs or other managed-care plans. The state pays monthly premiums to managed-care plans to provide care to patients, and the plans are required to provide access to all covered services, regardless of whether the cost of those services exceeds the paid premiums.
To ensure that the plans don't make too much of a windfall, the Legislature included in the law a so-called achieved savings rebate, which is established by determining pretax income as a percentage of revenues.
Under the achieved savings rebate, plans are required to return money to the state if their pretax incomes exceed certain thresholds. Simply Healthcare had to return the money based on the amount of money it brought in.
When asked whether the company's excessive income hurt patients, Freeman replied, “Simply Healthcare is committed to providing access to quality, affordable services and we continually support efforts that are in the best interest of the health and well-being of our members and the entire community. “
Simply Healthcare has participated in the statewide Medicaid managed-care program since the program's inception. The state is in the process of contracting again with managed-care plans. Simply Healthcare is one of 10 plans that have indicated interest in providing Medicaid services statewide.
The Agency for Health Care Administration notified Simply Healthcare on Nov. 2 that it needed to return the $1.8 million, according to agency spokeswoman Shelisha Coleman.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllU.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
3 minute readMiami Lawyer Guilty of Indirect Criminal Contempt But Dodges Paying Legal Fees
4 minute readWinston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250