Amazon-Whole Foods Deal Provides a Blueprint for All Business Owners
The $13.7 billion acquisition of Whole Foods by Amazon earlier this year was a curious choice by the online giant at the time, but a deeper look into basic concepts of the M&A deal serves as proof that Amazon has a plan.
December 05, 2017 at 11:17 AM
3 minute read
The $13.7 billion acquisition of Whole Foods by Amazon earlier this year was a curious choice by the online giant at the time, but a deeper look into basic concepts of the M&A deal serves as proof that Amazon has a plan. With the significant decline in brick-and-mortar retail over the past few years, due in large part to Amazon engulfing the industry along with other major online marketplaces such as Alibaba and eBay, one would assume that acquiring a physical retail chain would be counter-intuitive given the current market climate. However, Amazon analyzed the existing state of its business and its due diligence concluded that the addition of Whole Foods was just the synergy it needed to implement its takeover of the grocery industry and fill a glaring weakness in its business plan.
The deal opens up 465 physical stores to Amazon for distribution in prime locations throughout the United States. The idea of an online and home delivery grocer which has distribution sites throughout the country could take over grocery shopping as we know it; and Amazon saw that. Amazon can utilize the physical locations as a storefront and showroom, while simultaneously running a distribution operation out of the back of the same locations. The vast distribution sites will also allow Amazon to cut costs and, in turn, prices on many grocery products to further drive competition in the industry.
In addition to the physical benefits of the deal, Amazon will further grow its intellectual database to better tailor customer shopping experiences. Since Whole Foods is a subsidiary of Amazon, Whole Foods is a separately run organization not subject to Amazon's activist shareholder base. This allows Amazon to take risks and reinsert cash flow back into the business without having to worry about the stock price. Amazon, through Whole Foods, will be able to develop customer shopping experiences at both the online and physical store levels, by introducing technologies that interpret and analyze customer shopping habits.
The Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods provides a solid lesson for business owners of all sizes. By engaging in an analysis of your business's strengths and weaknesses, you will be able to determine what areas could use improvement. It is not always best to try pouring money into your business to fix your weaknesses. There is likely to be one or more businesses out there that will provide the optimal synergies to your business with a business structure already in place. Amazon found that it could better serve its customer base and expand into the grocery industry by acquiring Whole Foods as opposed to pouring money into its own attempts to develop a grocery business. With that, Amazon was able to acquire valuable real estate throughout the United States, a distribution hub network, and a substantially improved customer database to develop tailored shopping experiences.
As a business owner, continued internal analysis of your business' efficiency to make improvements from within is important, but it is just as important to be knowledgeable of opportunities presented by the market. Every business owner should sit down with their legal and financial adviser to discuss opportunities that can improve and grow their businesses; it may turn out that a strategic acquisition was what you were missing all along.
Bryan J. Rush is an associate with Tripp Scott in Fort Lauderdale. He focuses on corporate and real estate transactions, entrepreneurial business services, and providing counsel to businesses of all sizes in various industries and markets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250