Florida Tops 'Judicial Hellholes' List by Pro-Business Group
The American Tort Reform Association decides the winner is Florida for its Supreme Court and the South Florida plaintiffs bar.
December 05, 2017 at 03:18 PM
6 minute read
Florida tops the annual pro-business Judicial Hellholes list with special recognition for the state Supreme Court's “barely contained contempt” for other branches of government and “an aggressive personal injury bar's fraudulent and abusive practices in South Florida.”
The report prepared by the American Tort Reform Association piles onto the conservative campaign against Justice Barbara Pariente, who also was targeted by the National Rifle Association for “a hushed discussion” with Chief Justice Jorge Labarga.
The report released Tuesday suggests “this majority is as partisan as ever and brazenly determined to influence the judicial selection process” when three justices retire in 2019. Pariente rejected Gov. Rick Scott's attempt to force her off the case after arguments.
The ATRA report highlighted four medical malpractice cases before the high court that “undercut patient safety, protected lawyers' fees, allowed higher damage awards and invalidated a law intended to reduce litigation.”
On the plaintiffs bar front, the report said, “Encouragingly, at least some plaintiffs' lawyers who've crossed the line are being held accountable.” The remarks refer to the arrests of five South Florida auto insurance attorneys accused of paying kickbacks in a personal injury protection fraud.
“With the help of some lawmakers, too many are still getting away with too much,” the ATRA report said of PIP attorneys.
Ryan Banfill, spokesman for the Florida Justice Association plaintiffs bar organization, said the state has a vibrant, functioning justice system.
“Our state has a vibrant justice system that is working to keep Floridians safe and deter insurance companies and big corporations from taking advantage of people and small businesses,” he said. “That's good for consumers and for business, too.”
Florida beat out California and St. Louis to lead the nation for the first time. The group cited eight jurisdictions where “too many judges seem more eager to expand civil liability than to respect precedent and the policymaking authority of duly elected lawmakers.”
The report also singled out “a gathering storm of abuse” on home contractor and auto repair assignments of benefits.
Also in the bull's eye for criticism are Coral Gables for suing Florida Power & Light over extended Hurricane Irma power outages, Americans with Disabilities Act enforcement lawsuits and asbestos litigation.
Judges were praised for imposing $9.2 million in sanctions on Jacksonville attorneys in Engle-progeny tobacco cases.
While the Florida Supreme Court was criticized for finding state laws unconstitutional, the Legislature also was panned for killing bills at the behest of “the politically powerful personal injury lawyers.”
In summary, the report said, “Florida shows little inclination to make a much needed course correction.”
Florida tops the annual pro-business Judicial Hellholes list with special recognition for the state Supreme Court's “barely contained contempt” for other branches of government and “an aggressive personal injury bar's fraudulent and abusive practices in South Florida.”
The report prepared by the American Tort Reform Association piles onto the conservative campaign against Justice Barbara Pariente, who also was targeted by the National Rifle Association for “a hushed discussion” with Chief Justice
The report released Tuesday suggests “this majority is as partisan as ever and brazenly determined to influence the judicial selection process” when three justices retire in 2019. Pariente rejected Gov. Rick Scott's attempt to force her off the case after arguments.
The ATRA report highlighted four medical malpractice cases before the high court that “undercut patient safety, protected lawyers' fees, allowed higher damage awards and invalidated a law intended to reduce litigation.”
On the plaintiffs bar front, the report said, “Encouragingly, at least some plaintiffs' lawyers who've crossed the line are being held accountable.” The remarks refer to the arrests of five South Florida auto insurance attorneys accused of paying kickbacks in a personal injury protection fraud.
“With the help of some lawmakers, too many are still getting away with too much,” the ATRA report said of PIP attorneys.
Ryan Banfill, spokesman for the Florida Justice Association plaintiffs bar organization, said the state has a vibrant, functioning justice system.
“Our state has a vibrant justice system that is working to keep Floridians safe and deter insurance companies and big corporations from taking advantage of people and small businesses,” he said. “That's good for consumers and for business, too.”
Florida beat out California and St. Louis to lead the nation for the first time. The group cited eight jurisdictions where “too many judges seem more eager to expand civil liability than to respect precedent and the policymaking authority of duly elected lawmakers.”
The report also singled out “a gathering storm of abuse” on home contractor and auto repair assignments of benefits.
Also in the bull's eye for criticism are Coral Gables for suing Florida Power & Light over extended Hurricane Irma power outages, Americans with Disabilities Act enforcement lawsuits and asbestos litigation.
Judges were praised for imposing $9.2 million in sanctions on Jacksonville attorneys in Engle-progeny tobacco cases.
While the Florida Supreme Court was criticized for finding state laws unconstitutional, the Legislature also was panned for killing bills at the behest of “the politically powerful personal injury lawyers.”
In summary, the report said, “Florida shows little inclination to make a much needed course correction.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGraffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readOrlando Man's Fake Political Fundraising Websites Stole Donations, Feds Say
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250