Revenue Growth for Florida Law Firms Below National Average
Average revenue in Florida grew only 2.8 percent in the first nine months of the year, while the national average was 3.7 percent.
December 05, 2017 at 06:08 PM
5 minute read
Average revenue at Florida law firms grew less than the national average in the first nine months of 2017, according to third-quarter reports from Wells Fargo.
The Wells Fargo report included data from 135 firms across the country and found that revenue at Florida firms grew 2.8 percent in the first three quarters of the year, lagging behind the national average of 3.7 percent. Twelve Florida firms were included in the survey.
Meanwhile, revenue at Am Law 100 firms were up 4 percent, and Am Law 50 firms were up 4.2 percent, said Jeff Grossman, managing director of Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group in Charlotte, North Carolina. Am Law 200 firms averaged 1 percent growth at the same nine-month mark.
While results for Florida were weak, a survey of 180 firms by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group found different results at the regional level. The Citi survey reported revenue up 4.4 percent overall in the Southeast, which was a stronger performance than the broader industry average that survey found—an increase of 3.6 percent.
The Florida region underperformed in part because the state is home to more Am Law 200 firms than other regions and the Am Law 200 has generally underperformed this year in gross revenue, demand, revenue per lawyer and attorney head count, Grossman said.
A midyear survey showed a short-term uptick in demand and gross revenue nationwide, Grossman said, but over the summer some of the gains from the first six months were lost.
The 12 Florida firms included in the Wells Fargo survey are nearly all of the Am Law 100 and 200 firms headquartered in Florida, as well as some regional firms. The median rate of growth was down in the third quarter by about 0.7 percent, meaning more firms grew less than they did last year. Am Law 200 and midsize firms have been losing market share to larger firms, Grossman said.
“The demand for lawyer work in the Florida region, that was up 1.5 percent,” he said. “But utilization—hours worked per lawyer—that was down 1.5 percent.“
The Citi survey found that among 20 firms headquartered in the Southeastern U.S., demand was down 1.7 percent at the nine-month mark, as compared with the same period in 2016. That drop was lower than the broader industry drop of 0.2 percent. The performance of the Southeast region ranked ninth out of 11 regions in the country.
Even so, total lawyer head count in the Southeast is outpacing head count growth industrywide, despite softer demand resulting in a 0.9 percent drop in productivity in the region, the Citi survey found. Total head count in the Southeast rose by 2.4 percent compared with only 1.7 percent industrywide. Head count expansion is also occurring in the equity partnership ranks in the Southeast, the report said, while the broader industry is holding or even slightly contracting the equity partner ranks.
“They've got themselves positioned the way you would position your firm if you were expecting an increase in demand,” said Michael McKenney, head of credit origination for the Citi Law Firm Group.
The Wells Fargo survey found that the average number of hours worked per lawyer in Florida was 1,535, about 80 hours less than a typical Am Law 100 firm in the same period, Grossman said. In 2017, the Am Law 100 attorney utilization was flat, while the Am Law 200 was down 1.7 percent.
Meanwhile, both the Am Law 50 and Am Law 100 saw demand increase in the first nine months of the year, although the third quarter was down as compared with the first six months of 2017, Grossman said.
Because lawyers are working fewer hours, some firms have been reluctant to raise rates, Grossman said. As this trend continues, the already substantial rate gap between firms is growing.
“We are generally seeing lower than average rate increases for the Florida region,” Grossman said. “One of the reasons that you are seeing lower revenue growth on average is that the rates aren't growing as fast. Part of the reason we are seeing the larger rate gap is because the lawyers are underutilized.”
In the Southeast, lawyer rates are increasing by about 3.1 percent, according to the Citi survey. This is below the industry average of about 4 percent.
The Wells Fargo report said revenue growth drivers for law firms continue to be the billing rate, then lawyer utilization, and then expense management. The most successful firms, regardless of sector, are busy first, thereby improving confidence in their rates. The busiest firms do not have significant excess capacity, especially at the most senior levels.
McKenney said final 2017 results will heavily depend on collections in the fourth quarter. Firms are generally in a strong inventory position, and particularly so in the Southeast, where accounts receivable were 8.3 percent above the same period last year, according to the Citi data. Expenses are up, he said, particularly because of past increases in first-year associate salaries that put upward pressure on salaries of more experienced attorneys. Compensation expenses were up 8 percent in the southeast region.
“A number of firms have observed that some of their clients are slow in paying and they are trying to get their arms around why,” McKenney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250