Reputation Audit a Prerequisite for M&A Due Diligence
The information revolution has yielded a new benefit for the merger and acquisition community that can have significant impact on the decision of whether or not to move forward with a deal as well as ensuring the deal succeeds in the long term. In the past, PR/communication agencies were often called in only after the deal was done and to promote and manage message delivery to key audiences and ensure a smooth transition
December 06, 2017 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
The information revolution has yielded a new benefit for the merger and acquisition community that can have significant impact on the decision of whether or not to move forward with a deal as well as ensuring the deal succeeds in the long term. In the past, PR/communication agencies were often called in only after the deal was done and to promote and manage message delivery to key audiences and ensure a smooth transition. However, smart advisers are using those resources much earlier in the due diligence process to conduct a “reputation audit” and achieve benefits including:
- Determine extent of any reputational baggage that could affect integration on both brands;
- Identify concerns from geographic niches or select audience segments; and
- Provide comparable analysis of similar deals to anticipate reaction from regulatory agencies or likelihood of employee or customer attrition.
Reputational Baggage
Measuring goodwill has always been a mainstay of the due diligence process. But how to measure ill will? How will negative media exposure or social media slamming affect the deal? We recently worked with a large brand that was acquiring a troubled competitor. The reputation audit indicated the volume of negative media coverage and intensive social media backlash had the potential to not only swamp the acquirer's customer call center, but to dilute the strength of the acquirer brand. An analysis done in conjunction with the legal team revealed that in order for the brand to come out as savior and not a desperate vulture, it was necessary for a court appointed monitor who would manage the transition and provide enough distance to ease concerns. When the courts refused to appoint a monitor, the acquirer walked.
Micro Concerns
Exploring the pros and cons of geographic or niche audiences can eliminate some barriers to the deal and tensions after the deal. For example, a reputation audit indicated a target company did not share the same corporate social responsibility standards as the acquirer and working with the financial adviser identified the impact in terms of select shareholders who would want to know plans for compliance. The problem was determined to be surmountable. The deal continued and the announcement went more smoothly because this niche audience was addressed quickly and effectively. In addition, sometimes a deal looks different depending on where you sit. My company, rbb, worked with two large consumer packaged goods companies who planned to consolidate their headquarters in the state of the company being acquired. A media audit indicated the hometown had recently lost several other headquarters and it was expected there would be push back from the community on the announcement and potential impacts to retaining productive employees through the transition. Having more upfront time to address this communication challenge allowed for a more thoughtful response on day one. It also impacted the decisions on where senior executives would be located and how cascade communications training would be delivered to managers on both sides.
Comparables
Just like in real estate, a reputation audit can provide comparables on similar deals. How likely was the deal perceived to have succeeded in achieving its goals? What was the regulatory reaction and what messages were used to win compliance battles and which ones failed. By analyzing digital and traditional media coverage on similar deals for up to 12 to 18 months after the M&A event, rbb can determine potential land minds as well as best practices. We can then use those learnings to guide the communication plan should the deal move forward.
Reputation audits typically take four to six weeks depending on their complexity and have an added benefit in that they provide a smoother pathway for communications professionals to confidently convey the value of deals that move forward. M&A advisers seeking to add more efficiency to the due diligence process should consider bringing their communications partners to the table as early as possible.
Christine M. Barney is the CEO of rbb Communications.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Developer Drops Claims of Misappropriating Trade Secrets and Stealing Key Employees
5 minute read'Be Proactive With Clients': Florida's New Condo Regulations Will Require a Closer Look at Contracts
5 minute readReal Estate Transactions: Nelson Mullins Says Trust Is Key to Display Good Judgment
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250