6 Do's And Don'ts for Your Company's Holiday Party
The leftover turkey is gone, the stampedes at Wal-Mart are over, and 2017 is winding to a close. That can only mean one thing — it's time for your…
December 13, 2017 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
The leftover turkey is gone, the stampedes at Wal-Mart are over, and 2017 is winding to a close. That can only mean one thing — it's time for your company holiday party!
Here is a list of “do's” and “don'ts” to help you avoid liability in connection with your year-end celebration.
- DO throw a party!
Ebenezer Scrooge might know something about cutting costs, but you wouldn't want him in charge of your team's morale. Remember that the office holiday party is a much anticipated event, intended to reward employees for their hard work, reflect on a good year, and raise morale. Don't sacrifice your company party in a futile attempt to improve your bottom line for 2017.
2. DON'T delegate all of the responsibilities for planning the party to the employees who will attend.
Burdening your staff with the job of planning their own holiday party is counterproductive. (See above at point #1.) This fact notwithstanding, your event is more likely to be successful (and safe) if you and your management team take charge of the preparations. Holiday parties can be a legal minefield and your employees might not be on guard for those mines if they arrange the party themselves. After all, who is more likely to approve of an open bar: you or your employees?
3. DO keep your hands—and inappropriate thoughts—to yourself.
Holiday parties are a great opportunity to socialize, but professionals in your workplace should be able to do so without acting like they are on spring break. Be a model for your team, and conduct yourself in the same manner as you would at the office. Make sure that your employees know that your discrimination and harassment policies apply at all company functions, including the holiday fete. If your company does not have written policies in place, take immediate action! These policies are the first line of defense for employers facing claims of inappropriate work place behavior.
4. DON'T join the ever-growing ranks of those accused of sexual harassment in 2017.
Holiday parties this year will proceed in the wake of a nationwide conversation about sexual harassment, ignited by serious allegations against Hollywood heavyweights Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey. The current climate provides an excellent opportunity for discussion and reminds us of the importance of fostering a workplace environment that does not tolerate any type of harassment. The law defines sexual harassment as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment. Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person's sex. Remind your employees that your holiday gathering — while it may be “off campus” and “after hours” — is still a professional event and must be treated as such.
5. DO consider alternative sources of entertainment.
One subtle way to help your employees avoid overindulgence in the eggnog is to offer something to do other than imbibe! Consider bringing in a photo booth, poker table, pinball machine, magician or other entertainment. For example, our firm puts together a comedic sketch movie featuring different employees in various roles. Employees who are busy watching their exploits on the big screen are less likely to spend too much time at the bar.
6. DON'T ruin the revelry with a lecture.
We've experienced managers who used the holiday party as a platform to criticize their team's performance over the past year. Candid performance evaluations are an essential part of every work place, but openly criticizing your employees, especially at the holiday party, is a sure-fire way to kill morale. Why waste all of the time and expense that goes into the party by squandering that good will before the new year even begins?
Finally, DO send us an invite! We love a good holiday party as much as the next person, and we promise not to share any details in next year's column. We hope you have had a great 2017, and we wish you a wonderful holiday party!
Brooke Ehrlich and Michael Kantor are associates in the Fort Lauderdale office of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman. They focus a significant portion of their practice on labor and employment law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250