Florida Bar Votes to File Litigation Against Ticket-Fighting Startup
The bar board of governors voted to ask the Florida Supreme Court to decide whether the startup Tikd is practicing law without a license.
December 13, 2017 at 05:58 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Bar board of governors voted to seek an injunction against the traffic ticket-fighting startup Tikd for the unlicensed practice of law.
The board voted Dec. 8 to accept a committee recommendation to file litigation asking the Florida Supreme Court to determine whether the startup is violating state rules, bar spokeswoman Francine Walker said.
The Coral Gables-based company launched earlier this year, offering people with minor traffic tickets a way to quickly enter information into a smartphone app and have lawyers contracted by Tikd fight their cases.
A knock-down, drag-out fight ensued with the 30-year-old ticket defense law firm The Ticket Clinic. The firm sued Tikd, claiming the startup was holding itself out as a law firm and paying court fines for customers, something an attorney is not allowed to do. Tikd sued back, saying The Ticket Clinic was calling lawyers and scaring them out of doing business with Tikd.
Both cases were withdrawn as the Florida Bar investigation made its way through circuit and statewide committees on the unlicensed practice of law. But then Tikd sued both The Ticket Clinic and the Florida Bar for $11 million for allegedly colluding to drive Tikd out of business.
After the Ticket Clinic issued a press release announcing the board of governors' vote, Tikd founder Chris Riley said he had heard nothing from the bar and “it looks as if the Ticket Clinic once again has access to confidential proceedings by the board of governors.”
“This is just another example of the system Tikd is struggling against,” Riley said in an email. “Groups of rich lawyers hide behind closed doors in expensive hotels and play favorites in order to allow their fellow 'elites' to do as they please—flaunting the very code of ethics that they are charged with enforcing, all while claiming immunity from action.”
The vote was taken in an open session, Walker said. The rules on the unlicensed practice of law do not appear to require the bar to notify a respondent to a complaint that is under investigation. If the Florida Supreme Court decides to move a case forward, it will issue an order to show cause to the respondent.
The Ticket Clinic founder Mark Gold said he believes Tikd's entire business model is based on violations of bar rules.
“This is a Pandora's box, a slippery slope,” Gold said Wednesday in a statement. “If allowed, Tikd is the first of many nonlawyers attempting to cash in on the legal profession without the supervision required by the Florida Bar.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250