State Officials Wary of Bond Change in Federal Tax Bill
Florida could be on the verge of losing a key financial tool that helped the state reduce the amount of money it owes by $1.4 billion last fiscal year.Through…
December 14, 2017 at 04:28 PM
8 minute read
Florida could be on the verge of losing a key financial tool that helped the state reduce the amount of money it owes by $1.4 billion last fiscal year.
Through June 30, Florida had cut the debt it accumulated to build schools, roads and other infrastructure over the last seven years by some $5.5 billion, Ben Watkins, director of state Division of Bond Finance, told Gov. Rick Scott and the Cabinet on Wednesday.
A major portion of that savings, $2.8 billion, came through the state's ability to use a financing technique known as “advance refunding,” which allows the state to take advantage of lower interest rates to pay off tax-exempt bonds that have higher rates.
Last week, Watkins warned aides to Scott and Cabinet members that the pending federal tax overhaul contained a provision that would eliminate the use of advance refunding by state and local governments.
In delivering his annual state debt report Wednesday, Watkins said that prohibition is “highly likely” to remain in the final tax bill since it was contained in the original House and Senate versions. Republican congressional leaders said Wednesday they had reached agreement on a final bill, though the measure would still need approval from the House and Senate.
“Unfortunately, Congress in the tax act is going to make it more difficult for us to save money through refinancing at lower interest rates,” Watkins told the governor and Cabinet members.
Over the last 7 ½ years, Florida has used the financial technique to carry out 98 debt refinancings, totaling more than $14 billion and resulting in more than $2.8 billion in savings, according to the new debt report.
In the 2016-17 budget year, the state had 14 refinancings, resulting in $304 million in savings, the report showed. Florida's total state debt has dropped from a high of $28.2 billion in June 2010 to $22.7 billion last June 30.
“That's a meaningful savings to the state. Those are real dollars. Those are not phantom dollars,” Watkins said.
Eliminating the advance refunding of the bonds is “going to cost every citizen and taxpayer in the state by disallowing states, cities, counties and school districts to reduce the cost of their debt,” he said.
Anticipating the end of the advance refunding with an effective date of the tax legislation on Dec. 31, Scott and the Cabinet on Wednesday approved plans to refinance $325 million in education construction bonds and another $100 million in debt related to the Florida Turnpike.
“I appreciate you moving so nimbly after that announcement to get some of those deals in the pipeline and save us a lot of money,” Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam told Watkins.
Watkins said those will be last advance refundings for the state unless federal lawmakers alter the ban in final negotiations on the tax bill. One possibility, Watkins said, would be providing state and local governments with a six-month or one-year “transition period” before the ban is enacted.
If the new tax law prohibits advance refunding, it means Florida will not be able to realize similar debt savings in the future, although the scope of the savings will depend on whether interest rates rise or not. The new report also showed Florida has already refinanced 62 percent of its outstanding debt, further limiting future savings.
At least the initial versions of the federal tax legislation would prevent advance refundings during the “no-call” period of the bonds, which typically is the first 10 years of a 30-year bond issue. However, Florida and other government agencies that issue tax-exempt bonds would be able to refinance bonds after that period, although Watkins said it would limit the refinancings.
“It doesn't take us out of the game entirely, it just makes the job more difficult,” Watkins said. “It makes us dependent upon the interest rates that exist at the time the bonds are called.”
Some federal officials have long sought to curb the use of tax-exempt bonds by states and local governments, arguing that they represent a “subsidy” since federal income taxes cannot be collected on the bond investors' earnings.
The potential change in the tax bill would save the federal government about $17 billion over the next decade.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for News Service of Florida.
Florida could be on the verge of losing a key financial tool that helped the state reduce the amount of money it owes by $1.4 billion last fiscal year.
Through June 30, Florida had cut the debt it accumulated to build schools, roads and other infrastructure over the last seven years by some $5.5 billion, Ben Watkins, director of state Division of Bond Finance, told Gov. Rick Scott and the Cabinet on Wednesday.
A major portion of that savings, $2.8 billion, came through the state's ability to use a financing technique known as “advance refunding,” which allows the state to take advantage of lower interest rates to pay off tax-exempt bonds that have higher rates.
Last week, Watkins warned aides to Scott and Cabinet members that the pending federal tax overhaul contained a provision that would eliminate the use of advance refunding by state and local governments.
In delivering his annual state debt report Wednesday, Watkins said that prohibition is “highly likely” to remain in the final tax bill since it was contained in the original House and Senate versions. Republican congressional leaders said Wednesday they had reached agreement on a final bill, though the measure would still need approval from the House and Senate.
“Unfortunately, Congress in the tax act is going to make it more difficult for us to save money through refinancing at lower interest rates,” Watkins told the governor and Cabinet members.
Over the last 7 ½ years, Florida has used the financial technique to carry out 98 debt refinancings, totaling more than $14 billion and resulting in more than $2.8 billion in savings, according to the new debt report.
In the 2016-17 budget year, the state had 14 refinancings, resulting in $304 million in savings, the report showed. Florida's total state debt has dropped from a high of $28.2 billion in June 2010 to $22.7 billion last June 30.
“That's a meaningful savings to the state. Those are real dollars. Those are not phantom dollars,” Watkins said.
Eliminating the advance refunding of the bonds is “going to cost every citizen and taxpayer in the state by disallowing states, cities, counties and school districts to reduce the cost of their debt,” he said.
Anticipating the end of the advance refunding with an effective date of the tax legislation on Dec. 31, Scott and the Cabinet on Wednesday approved plans to refinance $325 million in education construction bonds and another $100 million in debt related to the Florida Turnpike.
“I appreciate you moving so nimbly after that announcement to get some of those deals in the pipeline and save us a lot of money,” Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam told Watkins.
Watkins said those will be last advance refundings for the state unless federal lawmakers alter the ban in final negotiations on the tax bill. One possibility, Watkins said, would be providing state and local governments with a six-month or one-year “transition period” before the ban is enacted.
If the new tax law prohibits advance refunding, it means Florida will not be able to realize similar debt savings in the future, although the scope of the savings will depend on whether interest rates rise or not. The new report also showed Florida has already refinanced 62 percent of its outstanding debt, further limiting future savings.
At least the initial versions of the federal tax legislation would prevent advance refundings during the “no-call” period of the bonds, which typically is the first 10 years of a 30-year bond issue. However, Florida and other government agencies that issue tax-exempt bonds would be able to refinance bonds after that period, although Watkins said it would limit the refinancings.
“It doesn't take us out of the game entirely, it just makes the job more difficult,” Watkins said. “It makes us dependent upon the interest rates that exist at the time the bonds are called.”
Some federal officials have long sought to curb the use of tax-exempt bonds by states and local governments, arguing that they represent a “subsidy” since federal income taxes cannot be collected on the bond investors' earnings.
The potential change in the tax bill would save the federal government about $17 billion over the next decade.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250