First Blind SCOTUS Clerk Forges New Path Outside the Law
Miami native Isaac Lidsky
December 15, 2017 at 02:18 PM
6 minute read
Miami native Isaac Lidsky likes to say losing his sight gave him his vision.
Lidsky's retinas started deteriorating when he was 12, and he was blind by the time he turned 25. But that didn't stop him from graduating from Harvard at 19, earning his law degree and going on to clerk for retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in 2008.
“I applied four years in a row,” Lidsky, 38, said. ”I used to joke that I was going to keep applying until I was older than the youngest justice.”
Former Supreme Court clerks are already a distinguished group, but Lidsky adds his own distinctions: Not only is he the only blind person ever to clerk for the court, but he is also one of few who decide to leave the legal profession afterward.
The majority of those who clerked from 2005 to 2015 now work for law firms, with government and academia attracting most of the rest. But those paths were not for Lidsky, who was a child actor and co-founded an Internet startup, X+1, shortly after college. It later sold to Rocket Fuel for $230 million.
Exclusive Report: SCOTUS ClerksThis article is part of a series examining the professional pathways and diversity of Supreme Court law clerks.• A Look Inside the Elite World of Supreme Court Law Clerks“I never would have imagined doing anything for 40 years or, frankly, even 10,” he said. “I still don't.”
Lidsky was a Third Circuit clerk in Philadelphia and worked as a Justice Department lawyer. But he found himself “pretty unhappy” once he made the jump to Big Law to work at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, he said. His wife, Dorothy, gave birth to triplets in 2010.
A career coach helped Lidsky realize he wanted to run a business, and in 2011 he decided to leave his Manhattan job and join his former college roommate in buying a struggling Orlando construction company to see if they could turn it around. At first, it didn't go so well.
“Dorothy and I spent a lot of time discussing my metaphysical discontent with the practice of law,” Lidsky said. “Four or five short months later, we were contemplating bankruptcy and talking to her parents about potentially moving in with them with our then 1-year-old triplets. In those days, it certainly seemed I had fallen into the 'grass is always greener' trap and maybe the practice of law wasn't so bad after all.”
A thought came to him: What would Sandra Day O'Connor do?
“She's really someone who lives the idea that we should do the deeds that need to be done, not spend a lot of time on drama or wallowing or wishing for what might have been,” he said. ”Instead, roll up your sleeves and get to work. That was very helpful to me in sort of steadying my nerves and keeping my focus on trying to rescue our business.”
Nowadays, ODC Construction Co. is a $150 million company — but, true to form, Lidsky is shifting gears again. The Windermere resident handed over the reins of the company and wrote a book, “Eyes Wide Open,” about what his life's journey taught him about shaping one's own reality. The book's release in March sent Lidsky around the country to talk to businesses about his vision.
When Lidsky stopped in Dania Beach for Berger Singerman's BusinessTalk in October, firm co-chair Paul Singerman found himself inspired.
“The most powerful takeaway for me from Isaac's talk was a feeling of almost embarrassment when I find myself dwelling on problems or feeling sorry for myself as a result of the ups and downs of my law practice,” Singerman said. “Because the adversity with which Isaac has dealt and the incredible manner in which he has overcome that adversity and succeeded in the face of extraordinary challenges is quite impactful.”
It must have been “extraordinarily hard” for Lidsky to exit the law after being so successful, but it's important for lawyers to realize that passion is a key ingredient to greatness, Singerman said.
Lidsky said he knew even as a Supreme Court clerk — where he also did work for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — that his mindset wasn't exactly the same as the other clerks.
“My passion was for the institution of the court and its history and its inside baseball, whereas most of my colleagues, I thought had a real passion for the law itself and, in particular, for a chosen legal philosophy or jurisprudence,” he said.
Because he's left the law, Lidsky declined to comment on whether diversity among clerks affects the court's decision-making. He is the son of Jewish immigrants from Cuba and grew up watching his father, now-retired Miami lawyer Carlos Lidsky, arguing cases.
As for his blindness, Lidsky said it didn't present any real obstacles during his clerkship. With help from library and technology staff, he got digital materials that software would read to him at his chosen speed. Lidsky can absorb about 700 words per minute, whereas the average person reads 400 words per minute, he said.
Lidsky said he knows it might sound odd, but going blind was one of the best things that happened to him. His blindness made him understand that so much of what we tell ourselves about “reality” is an illusion. That, Lidsky says, is his vision.
“It is ultimately not really about blindness or even disability, it's about the ultimate power we have to decide who we want to be and how we want to live our lives,” he said. “All the self-limiting instincts or reflexes we have that can get in the way of us manifesting our best selves — if we want to bring effort and discipline and purpose to our lives, we can overcome those self-limitations.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMediating Community Association Disputes: Tips for Attorneys, and Their Clients
6 minute readCole, Scott & Kissane Keeps Transitioning More Resources Into Construction As Tort Reform Changes Loom
4 minute readCheap Lumber, Stronger Hurricanes—Perfect Storm for the Strained Florida Insurance Market
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250