Appellate Court Reverses Sanctions Order Against Miami Gardens Lawyer
Broward Circuit Judge Dale Cohen's order did not make sufficient factual findings to support the $600 sanctions, the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled.
December 20, 2017 at 02:52 PM
3 minute read
An appellate court reversed a sanctions order against a Miami Gardens lawyer Wednesday, finding the trial judge ”failed to make any detailed factual findings” supporting the punishment.
Broward Circuit Judge Dale Cohen issued the sanctions order against attorney Gregory Ochalek, who represented the mother in a family law dispute. Ochalek withdrew from the case but said he was still serving as “non-advocate counsel” for the client when a different lawyer started taking action on behalf of the mother, according to the Fourth DCA.
The new lawyer, Jodie Bassichis, moved for sanctions against Ochalek for interfering in the case after he appeared at a hearing and moved to appear at a deposition. Ochalek had also accused Bassichis of behaving improperly.
Cohen ruled Ochalek was “barred from interfering and involving himself any further” in the case and ordered him to pay $600 in attorney fees to Bassichis as sanctions.
Ochalek appealed, arguing the judge didn't allow him to defend himself in a hearing and did not detail his reasoning for the sanctions. The appellate panel agreed with Ochalek, reversing the decision and remanding the case to the trial court.
“Here, the trial court failed to make an express finding of bad faith conduct,” wrote Fourth DCA Judge Melanie May, with Judges Robert Gross and Mark Klingensmith concurring. “It failed to make any detailed factual findings describing the specific conduct that resulted in the mother's unnecessary incurrence of attorneys' fees.”
Instead, Cohen ordered Ochalek to pay $600 to Bassichis after merely finding the fees were “reasonable and necessary.” The appellate panel ruled the order was insufficient under the inequitable conduct doctrine, which requires detailed findings to support an attorney fee award for misconduct.
“I'm shocked that I prevailed, but I think it was correct that I prevailed,” Ochalek said. ”But it's very difficult to prevail on appeals, particularly when you're in unwanted conflict with a sitting trial jurist, which I always try to avoid.”
Bassichis, of Kelley Kronenberg in Fort Lauderdale, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. According to the trial court docket, she is no longer involved in the case.
The sanctions dispute erupted after Ochalek told the judge Bassichis filed a pleading before he withdrew, and failed to properly notify the father about it. Ochalek told the court he attended a hearing because the mother “retained him to review her new counsel's billing methods, case progress, and provide 'strategic advice,'” according to the Fourth DCA.
According to the appellate record, Ochalek also said he told Cohen about a 2011 Florida Bar admonishment against Bassichis for performing “virtually no services” for a client in a child support case.
Ochalek was happy to see Wednesday's decision from the appellate court.
“I'm very satisfied that the appellate court fairly and squarely applied the controlling law to the record facts to obtain a just, American legal result,” Ochalek said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250