Patients Have an Absolute Right to Know: Another Win for Patients in Med Mal Claims
In the recent past, doctors and other medical providers here in Florida were heavily protected from negligence actions, which included limitations on certain documents which were “discoverable” and on noneconomic damages (pain and suffering, disfigurement, permanent disability, etc.).
December 21, 2017 at 01:15 PM
3 minute read
![Marcus Susen, partner, Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen in Fort Lauderdale.](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2017/12/Marcus-Susen-Article-201712211453.jpg)
In the recent past, doctors and other medical providers in Florida were heavily protected from negligence actions, which included limitations on certain documents which were “discoverable” and on noneconomic damages (pain and suffering, disfigurement, permanent disability, etc.). This often limited injured patients in not only proving their cases and the amounts they could recover, but also in finding a lawyer to take their case.
However, the tides are beginning to turn in favor of patients. The shift began this past summer when the Florida Supreme Court in North Broward Hospital District v. Kaitlin held that noneconomic damage caps were unconstitutional.
In addition, the shifting continued Oct. 26 when the Florida Supreme Court in Edwards v. Thomas ruled in support of a broad interpretation of Amendment 7 discovery. While the Kaitlin opinion received national attention, the court's opinion in Edwards flew under the radar of most. However, this opinion should not be overlooked as one first needs the right evidence to establish liability before noneconomic damages can be awarded, and Edwards may provide just that.
In short, Amendment 7 of the Florida Constitution grants patients the right to access all medically adverse incident reports of the health care providers or health care facilities that provided them treatment. The purpose behind Amendment 7 enactment was to grant patients the right to access a medical provider's history of acts, neglects, or defaults that may be important to the patient.
More specifically, Amendment 7 states in part: “In addition to any other similar rights provided herein or by general law, patients have a right to have access to any records made or received in the course of business by a health care facility or provider relating to any adverse medical incident.”
In Edwards, the plaintiff-patient requested a number of records relating to adverse medical incidents that occurred at the defendant-hospital's facility. More specifically, the plaintiff requested external peer review reports which contain performance reviews and assessments of physicians by their peers. The defendant objected arguing that such reports, which are required by law, were not considered adverse medical incidents, were not made in the course of business, and were protected by work-product and attorney-client privilege. However, the Florida Supreme Court disagreed holding that external peer review reports are discoverable. The court noted that “the language in Amendment 7 contains no limitation on the types of adverse medical incident reports that are now discoverable” and that “there is also no qualifying provision in Amendment 7 that limits the scope of discoverable records to those previously barred.” In the end, the court held, “Amendment 7 was aimed at eliminating all discovery restrictions on any records … relating to any adverse medical incident.”
Accordingly, the Florida Supreme Court has now made it clear that medical providers can no longer hide this crucial evidence from patients and their attorneys. Edwards marks another win for patients in the medical malpractice field and should be added to every lawyer's discovery handbook.
Marcus Susen is a partner with Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen in Fort Lauderdale. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cc/43/b38dd9c34388b0bf5f2a720c8c65/brian-tannenbaum-767x633.jpg)
Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute read![SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4c/fb/ea229c724a0a98c1858b6112649f/silver-chase-767x633-1.jpg)
SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute read![Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/04/Rebecca-Palmer-767x633-2.jpg)
Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute read![Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ac/5a/3196ba1c42a48ab3c0259cfcce88/hartsfield-martinez-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 2Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 3DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 4Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250